The DOI matches its Crossref record; 15 of the 19 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Project management: cost, time and quality, two best guesses and a phenomenon, its time to accept other success criteria
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The success criteria of projects are determined by cost, quality, and time [29,30], also called the 'iron or golden triangle'.”
From Blockchain Technology: Potential Applications for Public Sector E-Procurement and Project Management (2022) · cites this paper as [29]
In the citing paper
“In the world of production, the ideal outcome is often a trade-off between good (quality), fast (time), and cheap (cost), with firms rarely achieving all 3.11”
From Outcomes and Complications of the Mustardé Otoplasty: A “Good–Fast–Cheap” Technique for the Prominent Ear Deformity (2020) · cites this paper as [11]
Citations
Cites
Information Systems Success: The Quest for the Dependent Variable
DeLone, W. H., & McLean, E. R. (1992) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.3.1.60 · Cited by 10,697
Measurement of project success
de Wit, A. (1988) · International Journal of Project Management · doi:10.1016/0263-7863(88)90043-9 · Cited by 981
Information Systems: A Management Perspective
Alter, S. (1991) · Cited by 540
How can IS/IT projects be measured for success?
Wateridge, J. (1998) · International Journal of Project Management · doi:10.1016/s0263-7863(97)00022-7 · Cited by 476
How the right measures help teams excel
Meyer, C. (1994) · Harvard business review · Cited by 309
Handy, C. (2002) · Arrow Books · Cited by 286
CRITICAL SUCCESS FACTORS ACROSS THE PROJECT LIFE CYCLE
Al-Fahdawi, M. S., Rawi, O. S. A., & Hassan, A. S. (2025) · Journal of Al-Azhar University Engineering Sector · doi:10.21608/auej.2025.336575.1735 · Cited by 259
The 3-D Model of Information Systems Success
Ballantine, J., Bonner, M., Levy, M., Martin, A., Munro, I., & Powell, P. L. (1996) · Information Resources Management Journal · doi:10.4018/irmj.1996100101 · Cited by 163
Time and budget: the twin imperatives of a project sponsor
Wright, J. (1997) · International Journal of Project Management · doi:10.1016/s0263-7863(96)00059-2 · Cited by 94
System development methodology and project success
Saarinen, T., & Saarinen, T. (1990) · Information & Management · doi:10.1016/0378-7206(90)90004-2 · Cited by 69
Research works printed but not linked: 10
- Morris PWG, Hough GH. The Anatomy of Major Projects. John Wiley and Sons, Chichester, 1993.
- Gallagher K. Chaos, Information Technology and Project Management Conference Proceedings, London, 19–20 Sep. 1995, 19–36.
- Oisen, 1971, Can project management be defined?, Project Management Quarterly, 2, 12
- Burke R. Project Management. John Wiley and Sons, Chichester, 1993.
- Bernstein PL. Have we replaced old-world superstitions with a dangerous reliance on numbers? Harvard Business Review Mar-Apr. 1996, 47–51.
- Turner JR. The Handbook of Project-based Management. McGraw-Hill, 1993
- Morris PWG, Hough GH. The Anatomy of Major Projects. John Wiley, 1987.
- Pinto, 1988, Critical success factors across the project lifecycle, Project Management Journal, XIX, 67
- Williams, 1995, Why do software projects fail?, GEC Journal of Research, 12, 13
- Shenhar, 1997, Mapping the dimensions of project success, Project Management Journal, 28, 5
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 301–400 of 1,000
A dimensional analysis of stakeholder assessment of project outcomes
Chipulu, M., Ojiako, U., Marshall, A. J., Williams, T., Bititci, U., Mota, C. M. D. M., Shou, Y., Thomas, A., Dirani, A. E., Maguire, S., et al. (2019) · Production Planning & Control · doi:10.1080/09537287.2019.1567859 · Cited by 56
“Forming one side of the so-called iron triangle (see Atkinson 1999), quality – which we conceptualise as conformance to standards (Sousa and Voss 2002) – has remained one of the core dimensions in the assessment of project outcomes; however, both Ojanen et al. (2002) and Jung and Wang (2006) claim…”
BackgroundSilvius, G., & Schipper, R. (2022) · International journal of information systems and project management · doi:10.12821/ijispm040301 · Cited by 58
Adaptation and Integration for Multinational Project-Based Organizations
Berteaux, F., & Javernick‐Will, A. N. (2015) · Journal of Management in Engineering · doi:10.1061/(asce)me.1943-5479.0000366 · Cited by 57
Daoud, A. O., Hefnawy, M. E., & Wefki, H. (2023) · Alexandria Engineering Journal · doi:10.1016/j.aej.2023.10.052 · Cited by 54
Pursuing relevance and sustainability
Klakegg, O. J. (2009) · International Journal of Managing Projects in Business · doi:10.1108/17538370910991115 · Cited by 54
Knowledge transfer across projects: Codification in creative, high-tech and engineering industries
Cacciatori, E., Tamoschus, D., & Grabher, G. (2011) · Management Learning · doi:10.1177/1350507611426240 · Cited by 54
Radhakrishnan, A., Zaveri, J. S., David, D., & Davis, J. S. (2021) · European Management Journal · doi:10.1016/j.emj.2021.09.011 · Cited by 53
Key factors for achieving organizational data‐mining success
Nemati, H., & Barko, C. D. (2003) · Industrial Management & Data Systems · doi:10.1108/02635570310470692 · Cited by 53
Cultural sense-making integration into risk mitigation strategies towards megaproject success
Dyer, R. (2016) · International Journal of Project Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2016.11.005 · Cited by 53
“The nature of megaprojects depending on their management have either positive or negative impact on stakeholders and strongly influence megaproject success within the context of the iron triangle (cost, quality & time) (Atkinson, 1999).”
BackgroundApplying system dynamics approach in software and information system projects: A mapping study
Franco, E., Hirama, K., & de Carvalho, M. M. (2017) · Information and Software Technology · doi:10.1016/j.infsof.2017.08.013 · Cited by 53
The Role of Team Effectiveness in Construction Project Teams and Project Performance
Azmy, N. (2012) · Iowa State University Digital Repository (Iowa State University) · doi:10.31274/etd-180810-2950 · Cited by 56
Burga, R., Spraakman, C., Balestreri, C., & Rezania, D. (2021) · International Journal of Project Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2021.10.004 · Cited by 54
Agile software development projects–Unveiling the human-related critical success factors
Barros, L., Tam, C., & Varajão, J. E. (2024) · Information and Software Technology · doi:10.1016/j.infsof.2024.107432 · Cited by 79
Classics in megaproject management: A structured analysis of three major works
Pollack, J., Biesenthal, C., Sankaran, S., & Clegg, S. R. (2017) · International Journal of Project Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2017.01.003 · Cited by 60
Kamal, A., Abas, M., Khan, D., & Azfar, R. W. (2019) · International Journal of Construction Management · doi:10.1080/15623599.2019.1683693 · Cited by 52
“Atkinson (1999).”
An Empirical Evaluation of Knowledge Transfer Mechanisms for it Projects
Karlsen, J. T., & Gottschalk, P. (2003) · Journal of Computer Information Systems · doi:10.1080/08874417.2003.11647558 · Cited by 51
Ribeiro, P. M. G. A., Paiva, A., Varajão, J. E., & Dominguez, C. E. (2013) · KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering · doi:10.1007/s12205-013-0019-4 · Cited by 51
Shoar, S., Yiu, T. W., Payan, S., & Jalal, M. P. (2021) · Engineering Construction & Architectural Management · doi:10.1108/ecam-08-2021-0732 · Cited by 60
Adabre, M. A., & Chan, A. P. C. (2020) · Engineering Construction & Architectural Management · doi:10.1108/ecam-08-2019-0432 · Cited by 50
Transaction-related issues and construction project performance
Li, H., Arditi, D., & Wang, Z. (2012) · Construction Management and Economics · doi:10.1080/01446193.2012.655254 · Cited by 50
Success criteria of toll road projects from a community societal perspective
Rohman, M. A., Doloi, H. K., & Heywood, C. A. (2017) · Built Environment Project and Asset Management · doi:10.1108/bepam-12-2015-0073 · Cited by 53
Alashwal, A. M., Fareed, N. F., & Al-Obaidi, K. M. (2017) · Construction Economics and Building · doi:10.5130/ajceb.v17i2.5319 · Cited by 52
“PROJECT SUCCESS CRITERIA The measurement of construction project success has been refined to include elements other than the ‘iron triangle’ of time, cost, and quality (Atkinson, 1999).”
BackgroundMethodCharacteristics of Smart Sustainable City Development: Implications for Project Management
Schipper, R., & Silvius, G. (2018) · Smart Cities · doi:10.3390/smartcities1010005 · Cited by 49
“The authors of [61] study is one of many studies that show that corporations are not blind for the societal issues that we are faced with, and sustainability is frequently integrated into corporate strategy.”
BackgroundAdabre, M. A., & Chan, A. P. C. (2018) · Sustainable Development · doi:10.1002/sd.1919 · Cited by 59
Stakeholder Management in International Projects
Aaltonen, K. (2010) · Aaltodoc (Aalto University) · Cited by 51
Experiences from Sequential Use of Mixed Methods
Cronholm, S., & Hjalmarsson, A. (2011) · The Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods · Cited by 48
Time, Budget, And Functionality?—IT Project Success Criteria Revised
Lech, P. (2013) · Information Systems Management · doi:10.1080/10580530.2013.794658 · Cited by 50
WHAT CHARACTERIZES SUCCESSFUL IT PROJECTS
Karlsen, J. T., Andersen, J., Birkely, L. S., & Ødegård, E. (2005) · International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making · doi:10.1142/s0219622005001738 · Cited by 50
Carpenter, N., & Bausman, D. C. (2016) · Journal of Construction Engineering and Management · doi:10.1061/(asce)co.1943-7862.0001155 · Cited by 49
Zscheischler, J., Rogga, S., & Lange, A. (2018) · Sustainability Science · doi:10.1007/s11625-018-0556-3 · Cited by 56
“Hence, measuring project success means also accounting for actors’ different views (Stuckenbruck 1986 cit. after; Atkinson 1999; McLeod et al.”
BackgroundEnterprise Architecture Management's Impact on Information Technology Success
Lagerstro, R., Sommestad, T., Buschle, M., & Ekstedt, M. (2011) · Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS) · doi:10.1109/hicss.2011.187 · Cited by 49
Equifinality in Project Management Exploring Causal Complexity in Projects
Kapsali, M. (2012) · Systems Research and Behavioral Science · doi:10.1002/sres.2128 · Cited by 48
Koops, L., Bosch-Rekveldt, M. G. C., Coman, L., Hertogh, M. J. C. M., & Bakker, H. (2016) · International Journal of Project Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2016.03.007 · Cited by 48
Mukhtar, M. M., Amirudin, R., Sofield, T. H. B., & Mohamad, I. (2016) · Environment Development and Sustainability · doi:10.1007/s10668-016-9843-2 · Cited by 48
Success Management as a PM Knowledge Area – Work-in-Progress
Varajão, J. E. (2016) · Procedia Computer Science · doi:10.1016/j.procs.2016.09.256 · Cited by 49
Mapping IS failure factors on PRINCE2® stages: an application of Interpretive Ranking Process (IRP)
Hughes, D. L., Dwivedi, Y. K., & Rana, N. P. (2017) · Production Planning & Control · doi:10.1080/09537287.2017.1311431 · Cited by 49
“…management of user resistance, top management support and early stage implementation of organizational change management, have all helped to move the industry on from the traditional focus on time, cost and quality, the so called iron triangle (Atkinson, 1999; Kerzner, 2013; Young and Poon, 2013).”
BackgroundZhou, T., Zhou, Y., & Liu, G. (2017) · Habitat International · doi:10.1016/j.habitatint.2017.06.008 · Cited by 48
Nguyen, N. M., Killen, C. P., Kock, A., & Gemünden, H. G. (2018) · International Journal of Project Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2018.08.005 · Cited by 51
“In traditional project planning, project success implies reaching a predefined goal in terms of time, cost, and quality (Atkinson, 1999).”
BackgroundSynthesising performance in the construction industry
Mellado, F., Lou, E. C. W., & Correa, C. L. (2019) · Engineering Construction & Architectural Management · doi:10.1108/ecam-09-2018-0419 · Cited by 54
Sabir, I., Ali, İ., Majid, M. B., Sabir, N., Mehmood, H., Rehman, A. U., & Nawaz, F. (2021) · International journal of organizational analysis · doi:10.1108/ijoa-10-2019-1914 · Cited by 47
Using nudges to realize project performance management
Bukoye, O. T., EJOHWOMU, O. A., Roehrich, J. K., & Too, J. (2022) · International Journal of Project Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2022.10.003 · Cited by 48
Measuring project team performance: A review and conceptualization
Pavez, I., Gómez, H., Liu, C., & González, V. A. (2022) · International Journal of Project Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2022.11.001 · Cited by 61
Marcella-Hood, M., & Rowley, S. (2014) · International Journal of Project Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2014.12.002 · Cited by 62
The effects of cost-based contractor selection on construction project performance
Olaniran, O. J. (2015) · Journal of Financial Management of Property and Construction · doi:10.1108/jfmpc-06-2014-0008 · Cited by 47
The User Satisfaction Perspectives of the Information System Projects
Subiyakto, A., Ahlan, A. R., Kartiwi, M., Putra, S. J., & Durachman, Y. (2016) · Indonesian Journal of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science · doi:10.11591/ijeecs.v4.i1.pp215-223 · Cited by 51
“It was then adopted by Atkinson [23] by proposing his triangle model, especially by tracking where and what are the causes of the project failures across its implementation.”
MethodEffects of Risk Management Practices on IT Project Success
Pimchangthong, D., & Boonjing, V. (2017) · Management and Production Engineering Review · doi:10.1515/mper-2017-0004 · Cited by 51
Influence of procurement systems to the success of sustainable buildings
Tang, Z., Ng, S. T., & Skitmore, M. (2019) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.01.213 · Cited by 47
“Many researchers including Pinto and Mantel (1990); Atkinson (1999); Shenhar et al. (2001); Scott and Lam (2002); etc. have examined the success criteria (SC) in different construction projects stages.”
BackgroundRoutledge Handbook of Integrated Project Delivery
(2019) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.1201/9781315185774 · Cited by 47
Dealing with cost and time in the Portuguese construction industry
Moura, H. M. P., Teixeira, J. M. C., & Pires, B. (2007) · Portuguese National Funding Agency for Science, Research and Technology (RCAAP Project by FCT) · Cited by 46
Chen, W. T., Chen, T.-T., Lu, C. S., & Liu, S. (2012) · Journal of Civil Engineering and Management · doi:10.3846/13923730.2012.735062 · Cited by 46
Zailani, S. H. M., Ariffin, H. A. M., Iranmanesh, M., Moeinzadeh, S., & Iranmanesh, M. (2016) · Journal of Science and Technology Policy Management · doi:10.1108/jstpm-12-2015-0041 · Cited by 46
“Atkinson (1999) has identified human error whilst Love and Li (2000) have described poor workmanship as resource issues that cause project delays and poor project performance.”
BackgroundRisk factors for project success in the Chinese construction industry
Wu, Z., Nisar, T. M., Kapletia, D., & Prabhakar, G. P. (2017) · Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management · doi:10.1108/jmtm-02-2017-0027 · Cited by 47
Exploring the alignment between organization designs and value processes over the program lifecycle
Miterev, M., Jerbrant, A., & Feldmann, A. (2020) · International Journal of Project Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2019.12.003 · Cited by 48
Impact of Construction Project Managers’ Emotional Intelligence on Project Success
Montenegro, A., Dobrota, M., Todorovic, M. L., Slavinski, T., & Obradovic, V. L. (2021) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su131910804 · Cited by 57
Nilsson, S., & Ritzén, S. (2014) · Creativity and Innovation Management · doi:10.1111/caim.12054 · Cited by 45
Musa, M. M., Amirudin, R., Sofield, T. H. B., & Musa, M. (2015) · Construction Economics and Building · doi:10.5130/ajceb.v15i4.4514 · Cited by 46
Measuring and benchmarking managerial efficiency of project execution schedule performance
Iyer, K. C., & Banerjee, P. S. (2015) · International Journal of Project Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2015.10.008 · Cited by 45
A', N. A., Subiyakto, A., Ahlan, A. R., Kartiwi, M., & Putra, S. J. (2016) · International Journal of Business Information Systems · doi:10.1504/ijbis.2016.078908 · Cited by 45
Balancing Relations and Results in Regional Networks of Public-Policy Implementation
Klaster, E., Wilderom, C. P. M., & Muntslag, D. R. (2017) · Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory · doi:10.1093/jopart/mux015 · Cited by 45
Network Embeddedness in Exploration and Exploitation of Joint R&D Projects: A Structural Approach
Arranz, N., Arroyabe, M. F., & de Arróyabe, J. C. F. (2018) · British Journal of Management · doi:10.1111/1467-8551.12338 · Cited by 45
Papachristos, G., Jain, N., Burman, E., Zimmermann, N., Mumovic, D., Davies, M., & Edkins, A. (2019) · Energy and Buildings · doi:10.1016/j.enbuild.2019.109609 · Cited by 49
Performance Indicators for the Claim Management of General Contractors
Seo, W., & Kang, Y. (2020) · Journal of Management in Engineering · doi:10.1061/(asce)me.1943-5479.0000835 · Cited by 45
Ojiako, U., Petro, Y., Marshall, A. J., & Williams, T. (2021) · Production Planning & Control · doi:10.1080/09537287.2021.1909168 · Cited by 47
“First, on the grounds that project performance success criteria have traditionally involved independent measures of time, cost and quality (e.g. Atkinson 1999; Ojiako, Johansen, and Greenwood 2008; Chipulu et al. 2019), we separated quality and cost (item 7 of Lubatkin et al.).”
BackgroundGovernance, governmentality and project performance: the role of sovereignty
Müller, R. (2022) · International journal of information systems and project management · doi:10.12821/ijispm070201 · Cited by 44
“Generic measures were developed staring from a focus on hard measures, such as time, cost and scope accomplishments in the 1980s [42][43] to more balanced measures, which added softer dimensions, such as team-satisfaction and enduser satisfaction [44].”
BackgroundZhang, Z., Min, M., Cai, X., & Qiu, H. (2022) · International Journal of Project Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2022.01.002 · Cited by 44
Data-Driven Decision Making for Sustainable IT Project Management Excellence
Pantović, V., Vidojević, D., Vujičić, S., Sofijanic, S., & Jovanović-Milenković, M. (2024) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su16073014 · Cited by 44
Commercial Management of Projects
Lowe, D., & Leiringer, R. (2006) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9780470759509 · Cited by 44
Determining Critical Success Factors of Urban Renewal Projects: Multiple Integrated Approach
Chen, Y., Han, Q., Liu, G., Wu, Y. C., Li, K., & Hong, J. (2021) · Journal of Urban Planning and Development · doi:10.1061/(asce)up.1943-5444.0000775 · Cited by 44
The relationship between total quality management and the focus of project management practices
Bryde, D., & Robinson, L. (2007) · The TQM Journal · doi:10.1108/09544780710720835 · Cited by 44
Dual Impact of Cultural and Linguistic Diversity on Project Network Performance
Çomu, S., Unsal, H. I., & Taylor, J. E. (2010) · Journal of Management in Engineering · doi:10.1061/(asce)me.1943-5479.0000052 · Cited by 47
Varajão, J. E., Dominguez, C. E., Ribeiro, P. M. G. A., & Paiva, A. (2014) · Hrčak Portal of scientific journals of Croatia (University Computing Centre) · Cited by 43
Nauman, S., Musawir, A. U., Malik, S. Z., & Munir, H. (2022) · Project Management Journal · doi:10.1177/87569728221087161 · Cited by 48
“In the academic literature, project success was initially measured by evaluating three core success criteria of time, cost, and scope/ quality, collectively referred to as the “triple constraints” or the “iron triangle” (Atkinson, 1999; Belassi & Tukel, 1996; Jha & Iyer, 2007).”
BackgroundMaqbool, R., Rashid, Y., & Ashfaq, S. (2022) · Sustainable Development · doi:10.1002/sd.2327 · Cited by 42
Effect of path-goal leadership styles on the commitment of employees on construction projects
Famakin, I. O., & Abisuga, A. O. (2016) · International Journal of Construction Management · doi:10.1080/15623599.2015.1130601 · Cited by 42
The Assessment Purpose Triangle: Balancing the Purposes of Educational Assessment
Archer, E. (2017) · Frontiers in Education · doi:10.3389/feduc.2017.00041 · Cited by 42
“This is an adaptation of the project management Triple Constraints model, or project management Iron Triangle which is built on the premise of resource scarcity (Atkinson, 1999).”
MethodLessons for IT Project Manager Efficacy: A Review of the Literature Associated with Project Success
Millhollan, C., & Kaarst‐Brown, M. L. (2016) · Project Management Journal · doi:10.1177/875697281604700507 · Cited by 42
“This narrowed list of factors relating specifically to project management success includes: Organizational support for the project management executive leadership; management methodology or There is a quantifiable benefit in focusing on the delivery state of a project (Atkinson, 1999).”
BackgroundLadder to success – eliciting project managers’ perceptions of IS project success criteria
Pankratz, O., & Basten, D. (2022) · International journal of information systems and project management · doi:10.12821/ijispm020201 · Cited by 41
“Furthermore, numerous authors strongly question the sufficiency of ATP as sole criterion to measure IS project success (e.g., [1] [4] [5] [15] [16]) for the following reasons.”
BackgroundInfluentialAccelerating time to impact: Deconstructing practices to achieve project value
Svejvig, P., Geraldi, J. G., & Grex, S. (2019) · International Journal of Project Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2018.12.003 · Cited by 42
Characterizing third-party logistics setups in the context of construction
Fredriksson, A., Janné, M., & Rudberg, M. (2021) · International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management · doi:10.1108/ijpdlm-03-2019-0078 · Cited by 42
Malik, S., Taqi, M., Martins, J., Mata, M., Pereira, J., & Abreu, A. (2021) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su13084513 · Cited by 53
Klaus-Rosińska, A., & Iwko, J. (2021) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su13179877 · Cited by 42
“However, many researchers emphasize that even taking all of these criteria into account at once, evaluating the success of a project using them will be insufficient [25,34,54].”
BackgroundFriedrich, K. (2021) · Management Review Quarterly · doi:10.1007/s11301-021-00230-z · Cited by 53
“2017) or social impact out of the organisational scope (Atkinson 1999).”
BackgroundChen, S., Zeng, Y., Majdi, A., Salameh, A. A. M., Alkhalifah, T., Alturise, F., & Ali, H. E. (2022) · Advances in Engineering Software · doi:10.1016/j.advengsoft.2022.103372 · Cited by 50
The impact of product superiority on customer satisfaction in project management
Haverila, M. J., & Fehr, K. (2016) · International Journal of Project Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2016.02.007 · Cited by 41
The impact of rework and organisational culture on project delivery
Oyewobi, L. O., Abiola-Falemu, O., & Ibironke, O. T. (2016) · Journal of Engineering Design and Technology · doi:10.1108/jedt-05-2013-0038 · Cited by 41
Critical success factors for international development projects in Maldives
Yamin, M., & Sim, A. K. S. (2016) · International Journal of Managing Projects in Business · doi:10.1108/ijmpb-08-2015-0082 · Cited by 41
The impact of project manager on project success — The case of ICT sector
Blaskovics, B. (2016) · Society and Economy · doi:10.1556/204.2016.38.2.7 · Cited by 41
Hasanzadeh, S., Esmaeili, B., Nasrollahi, S., Gad, G. M., & Gransberg, D. D. (2018) · Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction · doi:10.1061/(asce)la.1943-4170.0000251 · Cited by 41
“In the literature and in practice, the outcomes most frequently used to define project success are cost, time, and quality—also known as the iron triangle (Atkinson 1999).”
BackgroundHow universal are IT project success and failure factors? Evidence from Hungary
Aranyossy, M., Blaskovics, B., & Horváth, Á. A. (2017) · Information Systems Management · doi:10.1080/10580530.2017.1416943 · Cited by 43
“…the effectiveness criterion (whether the project reached its objectives) and client and stakeholder satisfaction were also considered similarly important (see, e.g., Al-Tmeemy, Abdul-Rahman, & Harun, 2011; Atkinson, 1999; Baccarini, 1999; Cooke-Davis, 2002; Savolainen, Ahonen, & Richardson, 2012).”
BackgroundSankaran, S., Müller, R., & Drouin, N. (2020) · Systems Research and Behavioral Science · doi:10.1002/sres.2744 · Cited by 35
Transformational Leadership and Project Success: A Mediating Role of Public Service Motivation
Fareed, M. Z., & Su, Q. (2021) · Administration & Society · doi:10.1177/00953997211040466 · Cited by 52
“PS was initially described as a project completed within the allotted time, quality, and cost expectations (Atkinson, 1999).”
BackgroundIdentification and Evaluation of Success Criteria and Critical Success Factors in Project Success
Lamprou, A., & Vagiona, D. G. (2022) · Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management · doi:10.1007/s40171-022-00302-3 · Cited by 48
“…traditional method of assessing project success is based on a simplified scheme of the three basic SC (time, cost, and quality/performance), also known as the ‘‘Iron Triangle,’’ ‘‘Golden Triangle,’’ or ‘‘Triangle of Virtue’’ in the scientific community (Atkinson, 1999; Ika, 2009; Westerveld, 2003).”
MethodMuneer, M. A., Khan, N., Hussain, M. A., Zhang, S., Khan, A. A., Farooq, R., Moawwez, M. A., & Tariq, M. A. U. R. (2022) · Buildings · doi:10.3390/buildings12111856 · Cited by 63
“Poor communication might result in the failure of a project [8].”
BackgroundMethodGoal seeking and goal oriented projects – trajectories of the temporary organisation
Gustavsson, T. K., & Hallin, A. (2015) · International Journal of Managing Projects in Business · doi:10.1108/ijmpb-03-2014-0027 · Cited by 41
Perception of various performance criteria by stakeholders in the construction sector in Hong Kong
Lai, I. K. W., & Lam, F. K. S. (2010) · Construction Management and Economics · doi:10.1080/01446190903521515 · Cited by 41
Project management and system dynamics modelling: Time to connect with innovation and sustainability
Calderon‐Tellez, J. A., Bell, G., Herrera, M. M., & Sato, C. E. Y. (2023) · Systems Research and Behavioral Science · doi:10.1002/sres.2926 · Cited by 40
Herazo, B., Lizarralde, G., & Paquin, R. L. (2012) · Project Management Journal · doi:10.1002/pmj.21258 · Cited by 40
Different perspectives of public project managers on project success
Koops, L., van Loenhout, C., Bosch-Rekveldt, M. G. C., Hertogh, M. J. C. M., & Bakker, H. (2017) · Engineering Construction & Architectural Management · doi:10.1108/ecam-01-2015-0007 · Cited by 40
Ying, F., Tookey, J., & Seadon, J. (2018) · Benchmarking An International Journal · doi:10.1108/bij-11-2016-0176 · Cited by 40
Does one project success measure fit all? An empirical investigation of Brazilian projects
Castro, M. S., Bahli, B., Barcauí, A., & Figueiredo, R. (2020) · International Journal of Managing Projects in Business · doi:10.1108/ijmpb-01-2020-0028 · Cited by 46
Metadata
- Authors
- Atkinson, R.
- Affiliations
- Bournemouth University (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Atkinson, Roger
- Venue
- International Journal of Project Management
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1999-12
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 337-342
- ISSN
- 0263-7863 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2092587332
- Cited by
- 2,359
- References
- 19
- Citations by year
- 2026: 63 · 2025: 90 · 2024: 119 · 2023: 119 · 2022: 150 · 2021: 153 · 2020: 126 · 2019: 145 · 2018: 192 · 2017: 148 · 2016: 166 · 2015: 150 · 2014: 136 · 2013: 122 · 2012: 112
- FWCI
- 7.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- International Journal of Project Management (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Construction Project Management and Performance
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Software Engineering Techniques and Practices
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management of Technology and Innovation › Economic and Technological Systems Analysis
- Keywords
- project success criteria, iron triangle, cost, time, quality, stakeholder benefits, IT project management, information systems projects, project management framework
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review