The DOI matches its Crossref record.
On theory in operations management
Abstract
The field of operations management has been criticized for the inadequacy of its theory. We suggest that this criticism may be too harsh, and further, that many building blocks of theory are prevalent in the body of existing research. This paper has two goals. The first is to suggest that careful organization of our thinking can lead to useful, productive theories in operations management that demonstrate all the hallmarks of the familiar theories of natural science. We discuss the nature of scientific inquiry in general terms, and examine the implications for what should be expected from theory in operations management. Our second goal is to illustrate through examples how such theories and their related laws might be developed. Two theories are proposed: the Theory of Swift, Even Flow, and the Theory of Performance Frontiers. The Theory of Swift, Even Flow addresses the phenomenon of cross‐factory productivity differences. The Theory of Performance Frontiers addresses the multiple dimensions of factory performance and seeks to unify prior statements regarding cumulative capabilities and trade‐offs. Implications drawn from the theories are discussed and concluding remarks suggest the advantages of future theory development and test.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 22
- Anderson J.C., 1989, Operations strategy: a literature review, J. Oper. Manage., 8, 1, 10.1016/0272-6963(89)90016-8 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.2307/258555 · doi:10.2307/258555 · Paper page
- Charnes A. 1994. Data Envelopment Analysis: Theory Methodology and Application. Kluwer Academic Publishers Boston. · DOI · Paper page
- Clark K.B., 1996, Competing through manufacturing and the new manufacturing paradigm: is manufacturing strategy passé?, Prod. Oper. Manage., 5, 42, 10.1111/j.1937-5956.1996.tb00384.x · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1287/opre.36.2.229 · doi:10.1287/opre.36.2.229
- Deming W.E. 1982. Quality Productivity and Competitive Position. MIT Center for Advanced Engineering Study Cambridge MA.
- 10.1016/0272-6963(90)90094-T · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/0272-6963(90)90098-X · DOI · Paper page
- Hayes R.H., 1996, Manufacturing strategy: at the intersection of two paradigm shifts, Prod. Oper. Manage., 5, 25, 10.1111/j.1937-5956.1996.tb00383.x · DOI · Paper page
- Hayes R.H., 1979, Link manufacturing process and product life cycles, Harv. Bus. Rev., 57, 133
- Hayes R.H., 1979, The dynamics of process–product life cycles, Harv. Bus. Rev., 57, 127
- Hempel C.G. 1965. Aspects of Scientific Explanation. Free Press New York NY.
- Juran J.M. 1979. Quality Control Handbook 3rd edn. McGraw‐Hill New York.
- 10.1080/07408179208964220 · DOI
- 10.1287/mnsc.42.11.1576 · DOI · Paper page
- Samuelson P. 1947. Foundations of Economic Analysis Chap. 4. Harvard Univ. Press Cambridge MA.
- 10.1016/0272-6963(91)90024-R · doi:10.1016/0272-6963(91)90024-r
- 10.1108/01443579410072391 · doi:10.1108/01443579410072391
- Skinner W. 1974. The focused factory. Harv. Bus. Rev. May–June pp. 113–121.
- Skinner W., 1996, Manufacturing strategy on the s curve, Prod. Oper. Manage., 5, 3, 10.1111/j.1937-5956.1996.tb00381.x · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1287/mnsc.33.4.509 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1108/01443579510090381 · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
Wong, C. Y., Boon‐itt, S., & Wong, C. W. Y. (2011) · Journal of Operations Management · doi:10.1016/j.jom.2011.01.003 · Cited by 1,083
Effective case research in operations management: a process perspective
Stuart, I., McCutcheon, D., Handfield, R., McLachlin, R., & Samson, D. (2002) · Journal of Operations Management · doi:10.1016/s0272-6963(02)00022-0 · Cited by 1,050
Contingency research in operations management practices
Sousa, R., & Voss, C. A. (2008) · Journal of Operations Management · doi:10.1016/j.jom.2008.06.001 · Cited by 996
Pilkington, A., & Meredith, J. (2009) · Journal of Operations Management · doi:10.1016/j.jom.2008.08.001 · Cited by 537
Holmström, J., Holweg, M., Lawson, B., Pil, F. K., & Wagner, S. M. (2019) · Journal of Operations Management · doi:10.1002/joom.1073 · Cited by 330
Metadata
- Authors
- Schmenner, R. W., & Swink, M. L.
- Venue
- Journal of Operations Management
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1998-11-25
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 97-113
- ISSN
- 0272-6963 (ISSN-L)
- 1873-1317
- OpenAlex
- W2074847743
- Cited by
- 811
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 22.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: On theory in operations management. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0272-6963(98)00028-x
- The paper
- Schmenner, R. W., & Swink, M. L. (1998). On theory in operations management. Journal of Operations Management. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0272-6963(98)00028-x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.