Cited by 73Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitationPain Management and Opioid UsePsychometric Methodologies and Testing

The Pain Self‐Efficacy Questionnaire: Cross‐Cultural Adaptation into Italian and Assessment of Its Measurement Properties

Open access
Chiarotto, Alessandro, Vanti, Carla, Ostelo, Raymond W., Ferrari, Silvano, Tedesco, Giuseppe, Rocca, Barbara, Pillastrini, Paolo, Monticone, Marco·2015·Pain Practice

Abstract

The Pain Self‐Efficacy Questionnaire (PSEQ) is a patient self‐reported measurement instrument that evaluates pain self‐efficacy beliefs in patients with chronic pain. The measurement properties of the PSEQ have been tested in its original and translated versions, showing satisfactory results for validity and reliability. The aims of this study were 2 fold as follows: (1) to translate the PSEQ into Italian through a process of cross‐cultural adaptation, (2) to test the measurement properties of the Italian PSEQ (PSEQ‐I). The cross‐cultural adaptation was completed in 5 months without omitting any item of the original PSEQ. Measurement properties were tested in 165 patients with chronic low back pain (CLBP) (65% women, mean age 49.9 years). Factor analysis confirmed the one‐factor structure of the questionnaire. Internal consistency (Cronbach's α = 0.94) and test–retest reliability (ICCagreement = 0.82) of the PSEQ‐I showed good results. The smallest detectable change was equal to 15.69 scale points. The PSEQ‐I displayed a high construct validity by meeting more than 75% of a priori hypotheses on correlations with measurement instruments assessing pain intensity, disability, anxiety, depression, pain catastrophizing, fear of movement, and coping strategies. Additionally, the PSEQ‐I differentiated patients taking pain medication or not. The results of this study suggest that the PSEQ‐I can be used as a valid and reliable tool in Italian patients with CLBP.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/papr.12242

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chiarotto, A., Vanti, C., Ostelo, R. W., Ferrari, S., Tedesco, G., Rocca, B., Pillastrini, P., & Monticone, M.
Affiliations
  • Amsterdam Public Health (NL)
  • University of Bologna (IT)
  • University of Padua (IT)
  • Department of Evidence Based Physiotherapy A.I.FI. Piemonte Valle d' Aosta Turin Italy
  • Istituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri (IT)
Corresponding author
Chiarotto, Alessandro
Venue
Pain Practice
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2014-09-27
Volume
15
Issue
8
Pages
738-747
ISSN
  • 1530-7085 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-2500
OpenAlex
W2080510061
Cited by
73
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2
FWCI
1.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Pain Practice (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Pure Amsterdam UMC (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Amsterdam UMC (VU Amsterdam) - Institutional Repository (publishedVersion)
  • VU Research Portal (publishedVersion)
  • Archivio istituzionale della ricerca (Alma Mater Studiorum Università di Bologna) (submittedVersion)
  • Institutional Research Information System (Università degli Studi di Brescia) (submittedVersion)
  • UNICA IRIS Institutional Research Information System (University of Cagliari) (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Pain Management and Opioid Use
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
Keywords
Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire, pain self-efficacy, chronic low back pain, cross-cultural adaptation, Italian translation, measurement properties, construct validity, reliability statistics, pain catastrophizing, kinesiophobia, analgesic use, patient-reported outcomes
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Cross-Cultural Comparison, Female, Humans, Italy, Language, Male, Middle Aged, Pain Measurement, Psychometrics, Surveys and Questionnaires, Translating, Reproducibility of Results, Low Back Pain, Self Report, Chronic Pain

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review