The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Interactivity in human–computer interaction: a study of credibility, understanding, and influence
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation
Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A., & Jefferson, G. (1974) · Language · doi:10.2307/412243 · Cited by 11,350
Computer-Mediated Communication: Impersonal, Interpersonal, and Hyperpersonal Interaction
WALTHER, J. B. (1996) · Communication Research · doi:10.1177/009365096023001001 · Cited by 4,798
Nass, C., Steuer, J., & Tauber, E. R. (1994) · Conference companion on Human factors in computing systems - CHI '94 · doi:10.1145/259963.260288 · Cited by 579
Sproull, L., Subramani, M., Kiesler, S., Walker, J., & Waters, K. (1996) · Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1207/s15327051hci1102_1 · Cited by 399
MOON, Y., & NASS, C. (1996) · Communication Research · doi:10.1177/009365096023006002 · Cited by 291
Cited by
On seeing human: A three-factor theory of anthropomorphism
Epley, N., Waytz, A., & Cacioppo, J. T. (2007) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.114.4.864 · Cited by 4,069
Tidwell, L. C., & Walther, J. B. (2002) · Human Communication Research · doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.2002.tb00811.x · Cited by 1,242
Who Sees Human?: The Stability and Importance of Individual Differences in Anthropomorphism
Waytz, A., Cacioppo, J., & Epley, N. (2010) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/1745691610369336 · Cited by 1,228
Blut, M., Wang, C., Wünderlich, N. V., & Brock, C. (2021) · Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science · doi:10.1007/s11747-020-00762-y · Cited by 1,194
Hassanein, K., & Head, M. (2007) · International Journal of Human-Computer Studies · doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2006.11.018 · Cited by 986
Making sense by making sentient: Effectance motivation increases anthropomorphism.
Waytz, A., Morewedge, C. K., Epley, N., Monteleone, G., Gao, J.-H., & Cacioppo, J. T. (2010) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0020240 · Cited by 587
Too real for comfort? Uncanny responses to computer generated faces
MacDorman, K. F., Green, R. D., Ho, C.-C., & Koch, C. T. (2009) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2008.12.026 · Cited by 533
Gong, L. (2008) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2007.05.007 · Cited by 338
The effect of presence on human-robot interaction
Bainbridge, W. A., Hart, J., Kim, E. S., & Scassellati, B. (2008) · RO-MAN 2008 - The 17th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication · doi:10.1109/roman.2008.4600749 · Cited by 300
Phillips, E., Zhao, X., Ullman, D., & Malle, B. F. (2018) · Proceedings of the 2018 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction · doi:10.1145/3171221.3171268 · Cited by 233
The Effects of Image and Animation in Enhancing Pedagogical Agent Persona
Baylor, A. L., & Ryu, J. (2003) · Journal of Educational Computing Research · doi:10.2190/v0wq-nwgn-jb54-fat4 · Cited by 188
Klein, K., & Martinez, L. F. (2023) · Electronic Commerce Research · doi:10.1007/s10660-022-09562-8 · Cited by 180
Gong, L., & Nass, C. (2007) · Human Communication Research · doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.2007.00295.x · Cited by 168
A Taxonomy of Social Errors in Human-Robot Interaction
Tian, L., & Oviatt, S. (2021) · ACM Transactions on Human-Robot Interaction · doi:10.1145/3439720 · Cited by 133
Northey, G., Hunter, V., Mulcahy, R., Choong, K., & Mehmet, M. (2022) · International Journal of Bank Marketing · doi:10.1108/ijbm-09-2021-0439 · Cited by 95
A model of user adoption of interface agents for email notification
Serenko, A. (2008) · Interacting with Computers · doi:10.1016/j.intcom.2008.04.004 · Cited by 92
Bellur, S., & Sundar, S. S. (2017) · Human Communication Research · doi:10.1111/hcre.12094 · Cited by 69
University of Göttingen, Diederich, S., Lembcke, T.-B., University of Göttingen, Brendel, A. B., Dresden, T., Kolbe, L. M., & University of Göttingen (2021) · AIS Transactions on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.17705/1thci.00143 · Cited by 40
Designing Trustworthy User Interfaces
Zieglmeier, V., & Lehene, A. M. (2021) · 33rd Australian Conference on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3520495.3520525 · Cited by 19
Chen, Z., Xiong, Z., Ruan, X., Jiang, S., Wei, W., & Fang, K. (2024) · 2024 4th International Conference on Educational Technology (ICET) · doi:10.1109/icet62460.2024.10868064 · Cited by 7
On the Need to Rethink Trust in AI Assistants for Software Development: A Critical Review
Baltes, S., Speith, T., Chiteri, B., Mohsenimofidi, S., Chakraborty, S., & Buschek, D. (2026) · IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering · doi:10.1109/tse.2026.3659804 · Cited by 5
Metadata
- Authors
- Burgoon, J. K., Bonito, J. A., Bengtsson, B., Cederberg, C., Lundeberg, M., & Allspach, L.
- Venue
- Computers in Human Behavior
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2000-11
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 553-574
- ISSN
- 0747-5632 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2073692684
- Cited by
- 384
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 8.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
