Cited by 136Functional Brain Connectivity StudiesMeta-analysis and systematic reviewsNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

Beyond the single study: function/location metanalysis in cognitive neuroimaging

Fox, Peter T, Parsons, Lawrence M, Lancaster, Jack L·1998·Current Opinion in Neurobiology

Abstract

Cognitive neuroimaging maps the brain locations of mental operations. This process is iterative, as no single study can fully characterize a mental operation or its brain location. This iterative discovery process, in combination with the location-reporting standard (i.e. spatial coordinates) of the cognitive neuroimaging community, has engendered a new form of metanalysis. Response locations from multiple studies have been analyzed collectively so as to better describe the spatial distribution of brain activations, with promising results. New hypotheses regarding elementary mental operations and their respective brain locations are being generated and refined via metanalysis. These hypotheses are being tested and confirmed by subsequent, prospective experiments. Function/location metanalysis is an important new tool for hypothesis generation in cognitive neuroimaging. This form of metanalysis is fundamentally different from the effect-size metanalyses prevalent in other literatures, with unique advantages and challenges.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0959-4388(98)80138-4

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Distilling the extant literature necessitates new techniques for large-scale aggregation and synthesis of human neuroimaging data.

    “Distilling the extant literature thus necessitates development of new techniques for large-scale aggregation and synthesis of human neuroimaging data4-6.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fox, P. T., Parsons, L. M., & Lancaster, J. L.
Affiliations
The University of Texas at San Antonio Health Science Center (US)
Venue
Current Opinion in Neurobiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1998-04
Volume
8
Issue
2
Pages
178-187
ISSN
0959-4388 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1999400626
Cited by
136
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 6
FWCI
0.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Current Opinion in Neurobiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Keywords
hypothesis generation
MeSH terms
Brain Mapping, Cognition, Diagnostic Imaging, Meta-Analysis as Topic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review