Cited by 266Action Observation and SynchronizationMotor Control and AdaptationNeurobiology of Language and Bilingualism

Functional Segregation within Pars Opercularis of the Inferior Frontal Gyrus: Evidence from fMRI Studies of Imitation and Action Observation

Molnar-Szakacs, Istvan, Iacoboni, Marco, Koski, Lisa, Mazziotta, John C.·2005·Cerebral Cortex

Abstract

Recent neuroimaging studies have suggested that the inferior frontal gyrus (IFG) is important for action observation and imitation. In order to further explore the role of IFG in action observation and imitation, we pooled data from seven functional magnetic resonance imaging studies involving observation and imitation of simple finger movements performed in our laboratory. For imitation we found two peaks of activation in the pars opercularis, one in its dorsal sector and the other in its ventral sector. The dorsal sector of the pars opercularis was also activated during action observation, whereas the ventral sector was not. In addition, the pars triangularis was activated during action observation but not during imitation. This large dataset suggests a functional parcellation of the IFG that we discuss in terms of human mirror areas and the computational motor control architecture of internal models.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/cercor/bhh199

Cites

74 of 74 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The IFG (an inferior part of the PMC) is involved in identifying the goals of hand movements as opposed to action execution alone.

    “Two recent studies also identified the IFG (an inferior part of the PMC) as an area involved in identifying the goals of hand movements (e.g., during behaviors like drinking and cleaning) as opposed to action execution alone [Iacoboni et al., 2005; Molnar-Szakacs et al., 2005].”

    From Social cognition and the brain: A meta-analysis (2009) · cites this paper as Molnar-Szakacs et al., 2005

    The Discussion (pp. 5–7) links IFG activity to observing and understanding actions, rather than execution alone. But the study examined observation and imitation of mostly simple finger movements; it does not establish that IFG identifies the goals of hand movements such as drinking or cleaning. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Within the pars opercularis, the dorsal part is activated by action observation as well as imitation, while the ventral part is activated by imitation more than observation.

    “Within the pars opercularis, a distinction was made between dorsal and ventral parts with the dorsal part activated by action observation as well as imitation but the ventral part activated by imitation more than observation (Molnar-Szakacs et al., 2005).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Iacoboni M (2004) Understanding others: Imitation, language, empathy. In: Perspectives on imitation: from mirror neurons to memes (Hurley S, Chater N, eds). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press (in press).
  2. Preuss TM (1995) The argument from animals to humans in cognitive neuroscience. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Molnar-Szakacs, I., Iacoboni, M., Koski, L., & Mazziotta, J. C.
Affiliations
University of California, Los Angeles (US)
Corresponding author
Molnar-Szakacs, Istvan
Venue
Cerebral Cortex
Published
2004-10-28
Volume
15
Issue
7
Pages
986-994
ISSN
  • 1047-3211 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2199
OpenAlex
W2144823029
Cited by
266
References
74
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 19
FWCI
18.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Cerebral Cortex (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Center for Research Resources (RR08655, P41RR013642, RR12169, RR 13642, C06RR012169)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Action Observation and Synchronization
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Motor Control and Adaptation
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
Keywords
inferior frontal gyrus, pars opercularis, pars triangularis, action observation, imitation, finger movement, functional parcellation, mirror system, internal models, motor control
MeSH terms
Adult, Cognition, Female, Fingers, Frontal Lobe, Humans, Language, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Photic Stimulation, Psychomotor Performance, Databases, Factual

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review