Cited by 377Organizational Learning and LeadershipInformation Systems Theories and ImplementationInnovative Education and Learning Practices

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 101 of the 102 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Information technology and organizational learning: a review and assessment of research

Robey, Daniel, Boudreau, Marie-Claude, Rose, Gregory M·2000·Accounting, Management and Information Technologies

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0959-8022(99)00017-x

Cites

101 of 101 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Citations

Cites

Show all 102 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–200 of 375

Metadata

Authors
Robey, D., Boudreau, M.-C., & Rose, G. M.
Affiliations
Georgia State University (US)
Corresponding author
Robey, Daniel
Venue
Accounting, Management and Information Technologies
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2000-04
Volume
10
Issue
2
Pages
125-155
ISSN
0959-8022 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2047828136
Cited by
377
References
102
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 22 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 26 · 2012: 23
FWCI
18.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Accounting Management and Information Technologies (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Organizational Learning and Leadership
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › Information Systems Theories and Implementation
  • Social Sciences › Education › Innovative Education and Learning Practices
Keywords
information technology, organizational learning, IT implementation, institutional memory, organizational knowledge, situated learning, experiential learning, formal training, knowledge barriers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review