Cited by 197Face Recognition and PerceptionSocial and Intergroup PsychologyEvolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior

Why we respond faster to the self than to others? An implicit positive association theory of self-advantage during implicit face recognition

Ma, Yina, Han, Shihui·2010·Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance

Abstract

Human adults usually respond faster to their own faces rather than to those of others. We tested the hypothesis that an implicit positive association (IPA) with self mediates self-advantage in face recognition through 4 experiments. Using a self-concept threat (SCT) priming that associated the self with negative personal traits and led to a weakened IPA with self, we found that self-face advantage in an implicit face-recognition task that required identification of face orientation was eliminated by the SCT priming. Moreover, the SCT effect on self-face recognition was evident only with the left-hand responses. Furthermore, the SCT effect on self-face recognition was observed in both Chinese and American participants. Our findings support the IPA hypothesis that defines a social cognitive mechanism of self-advantage in face recognition.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/a0015797

Cites

57 of 57 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Subliminal exposure to images of one's own body automatically activates positive self-associations.

    “We know that even subliminal exposure to images of one's own body automatically activates positive self-associations [37,38] and thus we argue that perceptions of selfsimilar bodies may activate self-associations in the same way.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ma, Y., & Han, S.
Affiliations
Peking University (CN)
Venue
Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance
Published
2010-06
Volume
36
Issue
3
Pages
619-633
ISSN
  • 0096-1523 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1277
OpenAlex
W2169392191
Cited by
197
References
57
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 4
FWCI
5.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Natural Science Foundation of China (30630025; 30828012)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
Keywords
self-concept threat, face recognition (cognition), implicit associations, response asymmetry, cross-cultural comparison
MeSH terms
Adult, Association Learning, Attention, Character, Discrimination, Psychological, Face, Female, Humans, Male, Pattern Recognition, Visual, Reaction Time, Semantics, Verbal Learning, Recognition, Psychology, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review