Cited by 64Mental Health and PsychiatryPsychology and Mental HealthMental Health Research Topics

Charting the landscape of priority problems in psychiatry, part 2: pathogenesis and aetiology

Stephan, Klaas E, Binder, Elisabeth B, Breakspear, Michael, Dayan, Peter, Johnstone, Eve C, Meyer-Lindenberg, Andreas, Schnyder, Ulrich, Wang, Xiao-Jing +9 more·2016·The Lancet Psychiatry

Abstract

This is the second of two companion papers proposing priority problems for research on mental disorders. Whereas the first paper focuses on questions of nosology and diagnosis, this Personal View concerns pathogenesis and aetiology of psychiatric diseases. We hope that this (non-exhaustive and subjective) list of problems, nominated by scientists and clinicians from different fields and institutions, provides guidance and perspectives for choosing future directions in psychiatric science.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s2215-0366(15)00360-0

Cites

93 of 93 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Stephan, K. E., Binder, E. B., Breakspear, M., Dayan, P., Johnstone, E. C., Meyer-Lindenberg, A., Schnyder, U., Wang, X.-J., Bach, D. R., Fletcher, P. C., Flint, J., Frank, M. J., Heinz, A., Huys, Q. J. M., Montague, P. R., Owen, M. J., & Friston, K. J.
Affiliations
  • Wellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging (GB)
  • Emory University (US)
  • QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute (AU)
  • Gatsby Computational Neuroscience Unit (GB)
  • University of Edinburgh (GB)
  • University of Zurich (CH)
  • New York University Shanghai (CN)
  • University of Cambridge (GB)
  • Brown University (US)
  • Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin (DE)
  • Cardiff University (GB)
Corresponding author
Stephan, Klaas E
Venue
The Lancet Psychiatry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-01
Volume
3
Issue
1
Pages
84-90
ISSN
2215-0366 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2100222965
Cited by
64
References
93
Citations by year
2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 1
FWCI
21.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Lancet Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (acceptedVersion)
  • Max Planck Digital Library (submittedVersion)
  • ORCA Online Research @Cardiff (Cardiff University) (submittedVersion)
  • MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Wellcome Trust (091593, 503147, 091188, 095692, 093875)
  • Medical Research Council (MR/L010305/1)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH062349)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Mental Health and Psychiatry
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychology and Mental Health
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Mental Health Research Topics
Keywords
pathogenesis, etiology, mental illness, psychiatric classification, psychiatric diagnosis, research agenda
MeSH terms
Mental Disorders, Humans, Psychiatry, Research

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review