Cited by 809Neural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesMental Health and PsychiatryMental Health Research Topics

Computational psychiatry

Open access
Montague, P. Read, Dolan, Raymond J., Friston, Karl J., Dayan, Peter·2012·Trends in Cognitive Sciences

Abstract

Computational ideas pervade many areas of science and have an integrative explanatory role in neuroscience and cognitive science. However, computational depictions of cognitive function have had surprisingly little impact on the way we assess mental illness because diseases of the mind have not been systematically conceptualized in computational terms. Here, we outline goals and nascent efforts in the new field of computational psychiatry, which seeks to characterize mental dysfunction in terms of aberrant computations over multiple scales. We highlight early efforts in this area that employ reinforcement learning and game theoretic frameworks to elucidate decision-making in health and disease. Looking forwards, we emphasize a need for theory development and large-scale computational phenotyping in human subjects.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.tics.2011.11.018

Cites

91 of 91 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The autonomisation of goals from primary drives is a key feature of higher animals like humans and becomes more evident in pathological conditions.

    “The ‘autonomisation’ of goals from primary drives is a key feature of higher animals like humans (Pezzulo and Castelfranchi, 2009) and becomes more evident in pathological conditions, where certain goals such as gambling can become pathological and maladaptive (Montague et al., 2012).”

    From Active Inference, homeostatic regulation and adaptive behavioural control (2015) · cites this paper as Montague et al., 2012

    The ‘Computational modeling in decision-making’ section (page unavailable) describes addiction as seeking a drug despite acknowledging the damage, supporting the general point that a pursued goal can become maladaptive in a psychiatric condition. It does not identify gambling as an example or say that the separation of goals from primary drives becomes more evident in pathological conditions; the earlier claim that this separation is a feature of higher animals is cited to a different source. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • If a model indicates that a patient's symptoms stem from low precision in a certain circuit, one might choose a drug that boosts that neuromodulator.

    “On the pharmacological side, if a model indicates that a patient’s symptoms stem from low precision in a certain circuit (implying maybe inadequate neuromodulatory drive), one might choose a drug that boosts that neuromodulator (1).”

    From Predictive coding and neurocomputational psychiatry: a mechanistic framework for understanding mental disorders (2026) · cites this paper as [1]

    The Mathematical modeling section says biophysical models can predict the effects of medication on neuromodulatory systems. It does not connect low precision in a particular circuit to inadequate neuromodulatory drive or propose choosing a drug to boost that neuromodulator for an individual patient. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • These results underscore the integrative explanatory potential for computational models to reach a more complete understanding of brain function and its alterations.

    “More generally, these results underscore the integrative explanatory potential for computational models to reach a more complete understanding of brain function and its alterations [6].”

    From How Do Expectations Shape Perception? (2018) · cites this paper as [6]

  • Computational psychiatry offers a new paradigm by integrating mathematical models with neurobiology to explain psychiatric phenomena in terms of aberrant brain computations.

    “Computational psychiatry offers a new paradigm (1–5): by integrating mathematical models with neurobiology, it seeks to explain psychiatric phenomena in terms of aberrant brain computations (6).”
  • State-space models have been used to simulate bipolar phenomena, where a parameter representing gain or arousal varies over time and pushes the system from one regime to another.

    “State-space models have been used to simulate such phenomena, where a parameter representing gain or arousal varies over time and pushes the system from one regime to another (1).”

    From Predictive coding and neurocomputational psychiatry: a mechanistic framework for understanding mental disorders (2026) · cites this paper as [1]

    The Mathematical modeling section discusses biophysical simulation and emergent behaviors, while the mood-disorders section discusses computational models especially of depression. Neither passage describes a state-space simulation of bipolar phenomena or a time-varying gain or arousal parameter that shifts the system between regimes (searched: state-space, bipolar, gain, arousal, and manic-depressive oscillations). (LLM, conf=0.72)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. [17]Nagel E Newman JR Gödel’s Proof 1958 New York University Press
  2. [20]Kamil AC Foraging Behavior 1987 Plenum Press
  3. [30]O’Reilly R Munakata Y Computational Explorations in Cognitive Neuroscience: Understanding the Mind by Simulating the Brain 2000 MIT Press
  4. [78]Ray D Bayesian model of behavior in economic games Adv. Neural Inform. Proc. Sys 2008 21 1345 1353
  5. [94]Dickinson A Balleine B Gallistel CR The role of learning in motivation Stevens’ Handbook of Experimental Psychology, vol: 3: Learning, Motivation and Emotion 2002 3rd ed Wiley 497 533

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Montague, P. R., Dolan, R. J., Friston, K. J., & Dayan, P.
Affiliations
  • Wellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging (GB)
  • Gatsby Computational Neuroscience Unit (GB)
Corresponding author
Montague, P. Read
Venue
Trends in Cognitive Sciences
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-01
Volume
16
Issue
1
Pages
72-80
ISSN
1364-6613 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4245880239
Cited by
809
References
91
Citations by year
2026: 55 · 2025: 71 · 2024: 61 · 2023: 59 · 2022: 65 · 2021: 50 · 2020: 64 · 2019: 54 · 2018: 77 · 2017: 57 · 2016: 59 · 2015: 52 · 2014: 38 · 2013: 27 · 2012: 18
FWCI
2.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Trends in Cognitive Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (acceptedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • Max Planck Digital Library (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Autism Speaks (AS1947)
  • Wellcome Trust (091593, 091188, 088130)
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (R01DA011723)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Mental Health and Psychiatry
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Mental Health Research Topics
Keywords
computational psychiatry, mental illness, reinforcement learning, game theory, decision-making, computational phenotyping, theory development, cognitive impairment
MeSH terms
Mental Disorders, Biological Psychiatry, Brain, Concept Formation, Decision Making, Game Theory, Humans, Models, Neurological, Neurosciences, Reinforcement, Psychology, Computational Biology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review