The DOI matches its Crossref record; 11 of the 11 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Prediction, Learning, and Games
Abstract
This important text and reference for researchers and students in machine learning, game theory, statistics and information theory offers a comprehensive treatment of the problem of predicting individual sequences. Unlike standard statistical approaches to forecasting, prediction of individual sequences does not impose any probabilistic assumption on the data-generating mechanism. Yet, prediction algorithms can be constructed that work well for all possible sequences, in the sense that their performance is always nearly as good as the best forecasting strategy in a given reference class. The central theme is the model of prediction using expert advice, a general framework within which many related problems can be cast and discussed. Repeated game playing, adaptive data compression, sequential investment in the stock market, sequential pattern analysis, and several other problems are viewed as instances of the experts' framework and analyzed from a common nonstochastic standpoint that often reveals new and intriguing connections.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Cortes, C., & Vapnik, V. (1995) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1007/bf00994018 · Cited by 59,421
A decision-theoretic generalization of on-line learning and an application to boosting
Freund, Y., & Schapire, R. E. (1997) · Journal of Computer and System Sciences · doi:10.1006/jcss.1997.1504 · Cited by 20,466
The perceptron: A probabilistic model for information storage and organization in the brain.
Rosenblatt, F. (1958) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0042519 · Cited by 12,280
Factor graphs and the sum-product algorithm
Kschischang, F. R., Frey, B. J., & Loeliger, H.-A. (2001) · IEEE Transactions on Information Theory · doi:10.1109/18.910572 · Cited by 6,486 · cited 1×
“The dynamic programming implementations of the forecasters for tree experts and for the shortest path problem, both involving computations of sums of products over the nodes of a directed acyclic graph, are special cases of the general sum–product algorithm of Kschischang, Frey, and Loeliger [187].”
MethodFinite-time Analysis of the Multiarmed Bandit Problem
Auer, P., Cesa-Bianchi, N., & Fischer, P. (2002) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1023/a:1013689704352 · Cited by 6,033
Self-citationWIDROW, B., & HOFF, M. E. (1960) · doi:10.21236/ad0241531 · Cited by 4,009
Some aspects of the sequential design of experiments
Robbins, H. (1952) · Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society · doi:10.1090/s0002-9904-1952-09620-8 · Cited by 2,184
A formal theory of inductive inference. Part II
Solomonoff, R. J. (1964) · Information and Control · doi:10.1016/s0019-9958(64)90131-7 · Cited by 1,758
Subjectivity and Correlation in Randomized Strategies
Aumann, R. J. (1974) · Journal of Mathematical Economics · doi:10.1016/0304-4068(74)90037-8 · Cited by 1,630
Dawid, A. P. (1982) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1982.10477856 · Cited by 625 · cited 1×
“It was Dawid [80] who introduced the problem to the literature of mathematical statistics – see also Dawid’s related work on calibration and “prequential” statistics [81, 82, 84].”
Background
Cited by
A survey on concept drift adaptation
Gama, J., Žliobaitė, I., Bifet, A., Pechenizkiy, M., & Bouchachia, A. (2014) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/2523813 · Cited by 3,735
Huang, L., Joseph, A. D., Nelson, B., Rubinstein, B. I. P., & Tygar, J. D. (2011) · Proceedings of the 4th ACM workshop on Security and artificial intelligence · doi:10.1145/2046684.2046692 · Cited by 1,194
Foundations of Machine Learning
Mohri, M., Rostamizadeh, A., & Talwalkar, A. (2018) · doi:10.7551/mitpress/10290.001.0001 · Cited by 1,122
Philosophy and the practice of Bayesian statistics
Gelman, A., & Shalizi, C. R. (2013) · British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.2044-8317.2011.02037.x · Cited by 825
Popularity versus similarity in growing networks
Papadopoulos, F., Kitsak, M., Serrano, M. Á., Boguñá, M., & Krioukov, D. (2012) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature11459 · Cited by 634
Safe, Multi-Agent, Reinforcement Learning for Autonomous Driving
Shalev-Shwartz, S., Shammah, S., & Shashua, A. (2016) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1610.03295 · Cited by 509
Incremental on-line learning: A review and comparison of state of the art algorithms
Losing, V., Hammer, B., & Wersing, H. (2018) · Neurocomputing · doi:10.1016/j.neucom.2017.06.084 · Cited by 382
Non-stationary stochastic optimization
Besbes, O., Gur, Y., & Zeevi, A. (2015) · Operations Research · doi:10.1287/opre.2015.1408 · Cited by 337
ANTIDOTE: understanding and defending against poisoning of anomaly detectors
Rubinstein, B. I. P., Nelson, B., Huang, L., Joseph, A. D., Lau, S.-H., Rao, S., Taft, N., & Tygar, J. D. (2009) · Proceedings of the 9th ACM SIGCOMM conference on Internet measurement · doi:10.1145/1644893.1644895 · Cited by 331
Adaptive bound optimization for online convex optimization
McMahan, H. B., & Streeter, M. (2010) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1002.4908 · Cited by 227
Dynamic Online Pricing with Incomplete Information Using Multiarmed Bandit Experiments
Misra, K., Schwartz, E. M., & Abernethy, J. (2019) · Marketing Science · doi:10.1287/mksc.2018.1129 · Cited by 183
Learning Language Games through Interaction
Wang, S. I., Liang, P., & Manning, C. D. (2016) · Proceedings of the 54th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/p16-1224 · Cited by 132
Minimax Regret Bounds for Reinforcement Learning
Azar, M. G., Osband, I., & Munos, R. (2017) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1703.05449 · Cited by 124
Distributed Variational Representation Learning
Aguerri, I. E., & Zaidi, A. (2021) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2019.2928806 · Cited by 84
Machine learning for the physics of climate
Bracco, A., Brajard, J., Dijkstra, H. A., Hassanzadeh, P., Lessig, C., & Monteleoni, C. (2024) · Nature Reviews Physics · doi:10.1038/s42254-024-00776-3 · Cited by 79
Minimax group fairness: algorithms and experiments
Diana, E., Gill, W., Kearns, M., Kenthapadi, K., & Roth, A. (2021) · Proceedings of the 2021 AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society · doi:10.1145/3461702.3462523 · Cited by 74
Real time transit demand prediction capturing station interactions and impact of special events
Noursalehi, P., Koutsopoulos, H. N., & Zhao, J. (2018) · Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies · doi:10.1016/j.trc.2018.10.023 · Cited by 71
(2019) · International Conference on Machine Learning · Cited by 49
Meta-learning of Sequential Strategies
Ortega, P. A., Wang, J. X., Rowland, M., Genewein, T., Kurth-Nelson, Z., Pascanu, R., Heess, N., Veness, J., Pritzel, A., Sprechmann, P., et al. (2019) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1905.03030 · Cited by 47
Exploration-exploitation in multi-agent learning: Catastrophe theory meets game theory
Leonardos, S., & Piliouras, G. (2022) · Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.artint.2021.103653 · Cited by 39
Online portfolio selection strategy based on combining experts' advice
Zhang, Y., & Yang, X. (2017) · Computational Economics · doi:10.1007/s10614-016-9585-0 · Cited by 38
Ashofteh, A., Bravo, J. M., & Ayuso, M. (2022) · Applied Soft Computing · doi:10.1016/j.asoc.2022.109422 · Cited by 21
ICE: Enabling Non-Experts to Build Models Interactively for Large-Scale Lopsided Problems
Simard, P., Chickering, D., Lakshmiratan, A., Charles, D., Bottou, L., Suarez, C. G. J., Grangier, D., Amershi, S., Verwey, J., & Suh, J. (2014) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1409.4814 · Cited by 15
Multi-Agent Risks from Advanced AI
Hammond, L., Chan, A., Clifton, J., Hoelscher-Obermaier, J., Khan, A., McLean, E., Smith, C., Barfuss, W., Foerster, J., Gavenčiak, T., et al. (2025) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2502.14143 · Cited by 305
Zhu, M., Zecchin, M., Park, S., Guo, C., Feng, C., Popovski, P., & Simeone, O. (2025) · IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing · doi:10.1109/tsp.2025.3549222 · Cited by 6
The Principle of Total Evidence: Justification and Political Significance
Schurz, G. (2024) · Acta Analytica · doi:10.1007/s12136-024-00607-1 · Cited by 3
On The Statistical Limits of Self-Improving Agents
Wang, C. L., Dorchen, K., & Jin, P. (2025) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2510.04399
(2008) · ScholarlyCommons (University of Pennsylvania)
Metadata
- Authors
- Cesa-Bianchi, N., & Lugosi, G.
- Venue
- Cambridge University Press eBooks
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press
- Published
- 2006-03-13
- OpenAlex
- W1570963478
- Cited by
- 3,162
- References
- 11
- FWCI
- 59.54
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.