The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Impact of Antinutritional Factors in Food Proteins on the Digestibility of Protein and the Bioavailability of Amino Acids and on Protein Quality
Open accessAbstract
Dietary antinutritional factors have been reported to adversely affect the digestibility of protein, bioavailability of amino acids and protein quality of foods. Published data on these negative effects of major dietary antinutritional factors are summarized in this manuscript. Digestibility and the quality of mixed diets in developing countries are considerably lower than of those in developed regions. For example, the digestibility of protein in traditional diets from developing countries such as India, Guatemala and Brazil is considerably lower compared to that of protein in typical North American diets (54–78 versus 88–94 %). Poor digestibility of protein in the diets of developing countries, which are based on less refined cereals and grain legumes as major sources of protein, is due to the presence of less digestible protein fractions, high levels of insoluble fibre, and/or high concentrations of antinutritional factors present endogenously or formed during processing. Examples of naturally occurring antinutritional factors include glucosinolates in mustard and canola protein products, trypsin inhibitors and haemagglutinins in legumes, tannins in legumes and cereals, gossypol in cottonseed protein products, and uricogenic nucleobases in yeast protein products. Heat/alkaline treatments of protein products may yield Maillard reaction compounds, oxidized forms of sulphur amino acids, D-amino acids and lysinoalanine (LAL, an unnatural nephrotoxic amino acid derivative). Among common food and feed protein products, soyabeans are the most concentrated source of trypsin inhibitors. The presence of high levels of dietary trypsin inhibitors from soyabeans, kidney beans or other grain legumes have been reported to cause substantial reductions in protein and amino acid digestibility (up to 50 %) and protein quality (up to 100 %) in rats and/or pigs. Similarly, the presence of high levels of tannins in sorghum and other cereals, fababean and other grain legumes can cause significant reductions (up to 23 %) in protein and amino acid digestibility in rats, poultry, and pigs. Normally encountered levels of phytates in cereals and legumes can reduce protein and amino acid digestibility by up to 10 %. D-amino acids and LAL formed during alkaline/heat treatment of lactalbumin, casein, soya protein or wheat protein are poorly digestible (less than 40 %), and their presence can reduce protein digestibility by up to 28 % in rats and pigs, and can cause a drastic reduction (100 %) in protein quality, as measured by rat growth methods. The adverse effects of antinutritional factors on protein digestibility and protein quality have been reported to be more pronounced in elderly rats (20-months old) compared to young (5-weeks old) rats, suggesting the use of old rats as a model for assessing the protein digestibility of products intended for the elderly.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Effects of antinutritional factors on protein digestibility and amino acid availability in foods
Gilani, G. S., Cockell, K. A., & Sepehr, E. (2005) · Journal of AOAC INTERNATIONAL · doi:10.1093/jaoac/88.3.967 · Cited by 483
Self-citationFriedman, M. (1999) · Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jf981000+ · Cited by 339
Cited by
Control of Maillard Reactions in Foods: Strategies and Chemical Mechanisms
Lund, M. N., & Ray, C. A. (2017) · Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry · doi:10.1021/acs.jafc.7b00882 · Cited by 871
The Skeletal Muscle Anabolic Response to Plant- versus Animal-Based Protein Consumption
van Vliet, S., Burd, N. A., & van Loon, L. J. (2015) · The Journal of Nutrition · doi:10.3945/jn.114.204305 · Cited by 651
Gorissen, S. H., Horstman, A. M., Franssen, R., Crombag, J. J., Langer, H., Bierau, J., Respondek, F., & van Loon, L. J. (2016) · The Journal of Nutrition · doi:10.3945/jn.116.231340 · Cited by 221
Pulses for Bread Fortification: A Necessity or a Choice?
Boukid, F., Zannini, E., Carini, E., & Vittadini, E. (2019) · Trends in Food Science & Technology · doi:10.1016/j.tifs.2019.04.007 · Cited by 223
Kumar, R., Hegde, A. S., Sharma, K., Parmar, P., & Srivatsan, V. (2022) · Food Research International · doi:10.1016/j.foodres.2022.111338 · Cited by 209
Commonly consumed protein foods contribute to nutrient intake, diet quality, and nutrient adequacy
Phillips, S. M., Fulgoni, V. L., Heaney, R. P., Nicklas, T. A., Slavin, J. L., & Weaver, C. M. (2015) · The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.3945/ajcn.114.084079 · Cited by 197
The anabolic response to plant-based protein ingestion
Pinckaers, P. J. M., Trommelen, J., Snijders, T., & van Loon, L. J. C. (2021) · Sports Medicine · doi:10.1007/s40279-021-01540-8 · Cited by 170
Digestible indispensable amino acid score and digestible amino acids in eight cereal grains
Cervantes-Pahm, S. K., Liu, Y., & Stein, H. H. (2014) · British Journal of Nutrition · doi:10.1017/s0007114513004273 · Cited by 144
Contribution of muscle satellite cells to sarcopenia
Huo, F., Liu, Q., & Liu, H. (2022) · Frontiers in Physiology · doi:10.3389/fphys.2022.892749 · Cited by 74
Nichele, S., Phillips, S. M., & Boaventura, B. C. B. (2022) · Applied Physiology, Nutrition, and Metabolism · doi:10.1139/apnm-2021-0806 · Cited by 61
Manzanilla-Valdez, M. L., Ma, Z., Mondor, M., & Hernández-Álvarez, A. J. (2024) · Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry · doi:10.1021/acs.jafc.4c00380 · Cited by 58
Alternative dietary protein sources to support healthy and active skeletal muscle aging
van der Heijden, I., Monteyne, A. J., Stephens, F. B., & Wall, B. T. (2023) · Nutrition Reviews · doi:10.1093/nutrit/nuac049 · Cited by 45
Morgan, P. T., & Breen, L. (2021) · Nutrition & Metabolism · doi:10.1186/s12986-021-00574-z · Cited by 44
What is the best diet for cardiovascular wellness? A comparison of different nutritional models
Migliaccio, S., Brasacchio, C., Pivari, F., Salzano, C., Barrea, L., Muscogiuri, G., Savastano, S., Colao, A., & on behalf of Obesity Programs of nutrition, E. (2020) · International Journal of Obesity Supplements · doi:10.1038/s41367-020-0018-0 · Cited by 39
Aliyu, A., Olusola, O. O., Gilead, E. F., Abdullahi, S. U., & Michael, D. M. (2016) · International Journal of Livestock Production · doi:10.5897/ijlp2015.0268 · Cited by 12
Franczyk, A. J., Bui, N., Chen, J., Boyd, L., Wang, N., Sopiwnyk, E., Sarkar, A., Neufeld, J., Paliwal, J., Nickerson, M., et al. (2025) · Cereal Chemistry · doi:10.1002/cche.70003 · Cited by 1
Metadata
- Authors
- Sarwar Gilani, G., Wu Xiao, C., & Cockell, K. A.
- Venue
- British Journal of Nutrition
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2012-08
- Volume
- 108
- Issue
- S2
- Pages
- S315-S332
- ISSN
- 0007-1145 (ISSN-L)
- 1475-2662
- OpenAlex
- W2130546575
- Cited by
- 685
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 18.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.