Cited by 25Infant Nutrition and HealthGut microbiota and healthProbiotics and Fermented Foods

In vitro evaluation of the impact of human background microbiota on the response to Bifidobacterium strains and fructo-oligosaccharides

Open access
Arboleya, Silvia, Salazar, Nuria, Solís, Gonzalo, Fernández, Nuria, Gueimonde, Miguel, de los Reyes-Gavilán, Clara G.·2013·British Journal of Nutrition

Abstract

The microbial colonisation of the infant gut begins immediately after birth and is essential for the development of the intestine, the immune system and later well-being. Important differences have been reported in the characteristics of such microbiota in different infant population groups. In the present study, we employed an in vitro faecal batch culture model using faeces from different human population groups (adults and full-term breast-fed, full-term formula-fed and preterm infants) to determine the influence that the addition of four bifidobacterial strains and fructo-oligosaccharides (FOS) exerts on the profile of SCFA measured by GC as well as on the levels of some relevant intestinal microbial groups by quantitative PCR during incubation. Differences were found in the levels of SCFA and intestinal microbial groups in the faecal cultures depending on the human group origin of the faecal samples (P< 0·05), this being a predominant factor, compared with bifidobacteria or FOS added, in determining microbiota dynamics. These results exhibit the importance of the initial characteristics of the basal intestinal microbiota in the effect exerted by bifidobacteria or FOS that are added and highlight the need to design probiotics targeting specific human population groups.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0007114513001487

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Individuals with different gut microbiota composition appear to respond differently to Bifidobacterium supplementation.

    “Further evidence of the existence of a bifidobacterial-gut microbiota cross talk has been provided by the fact that individuals with different gut microbiota composition appear to respond differently to Bifidobacterium supplementation (73).”

    From Bifidobacteria and Their Health-Promoting Effects (2017) · cites this paper as [73]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Arboleya, S., Salazar, N., Solís, G., Fernández, N., Gueimonde, M., & de los Reyes-Gavilán, C. G.
Affiliations
  • Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (ES)
  • Hospital Universitario De Cabueñes (ES)
Venue
British Journal of Nutrition
Published
2013-05-31
Volume
110
Issue
11
Pages
2030-2036
ISSN
  • 0007-1145 (ISSN-L)
  • 1475-2662
OpenAlex
W2156579683
Cited by
25
References
23
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 3
FWCI
2.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • British Journal Of Nutrition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DIGITAL.CSIC (Spanish National Research Council (CSIC)) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
  • European Commission
  • Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad (AGL2010-16525)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Infant Nutrition and Health
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gut microbiota and health
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Probiotics and Fermented Foods
Keywords
human gut microbiome, Bifidobacterium, fructooligosaccharides, short-chain fatty acids, preterm infants, breast-fed infants, formula-fed infants, probiotics, prebiotics
MeSH terms
Adult, Bifidobacterium, Breast Feeding, Fatty Acids, Volatile, Feces, Fermentation, Gram-Negative Bacteria, Gram-Positive Bacteria, Humans, Infant, Newborn, Infant, Premature, Intestines, Oligosaccharides, Spain, Species Specificity, Probiotics, Infant Formula, Term Birth, Microbial Interactions, Prebiotics, Molecular Typing, Batch Cell Culture Techniques

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review