The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Low whole grain intake in the UK: results from the National Diet and Nutrition Survey rolling programme 2008–11
Open accessAbstract
Increased whole grain intake has been shown to reduce the risk of many non-communicable diseases. Countries including the USA, Canada, Denmark and Australia have specific dietary guidelines on whole grain intake but others, including the UK, do not. Data from 1986/87 and 2000/01 have shown that whole grain intake is low and declining in British adults. The aim of the present study was to describe whole grain intakes in the most current dietary assessment of UK households using data from the National Diet and Nutrition Survey rolling programme 2008–11. In the present study, 4 d diet diaries were completed by 3073 individuals between 2008 and 2011, along with details of socio-economic status (SES). The median daily whole grain intake, calculated for each individual on a dry weight basis, was 20 g/d for adults and 13 g/d for children/teenagers. The corresponding energy-adjusted whole grain intake was 27 g/10 MJ per d for adults and 20 g/10 MJ per d for children/teenagers. Whole grain intake (absolute and energy-adjusted) increased with age, but was lowest in teenagers (13–17 years) and younger adults up to the age of 34 years. Of the total study population, 18 % of adults and 15 % of children/teenagers did not consume any whole-grain foods. Individuals from lower SES groups had a significantly lower whole grain intake than those from more advantaged classifications. The whole grain intake in the UK, although higher than in 2000/01, remains low and below that in the US and Danish recommendations in all age classes. Favourable pricing with increased availability of whole-grain foods and education may help to increase whole grain intake in countries without whole-grain recommendations. Teenagers and younger adults may need targeting to help increase whole grain consumption.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Dietary recommendations have often been unclear or inconsistent with regard to the amount of whole grains that should be eaten to reduce the risk of chronic disease.
“Despite a growing body of epidemiological evidence for the health benefits of whole grain consumption, dietary recommendations have often been unclear or inconsistent with regard to the amount of whole grains that should be eaten to reduce the risk of chronic disease.”
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
New hypotheses for the health-protective mechanisms of whole-grain cereals: what is beyond fibre?
Fardet, A. (2010) · Nutrition Research Reviews · doi:10.1017/s0954422410000041 · Cited by 1,030
de Munter, J. S. L., Hu, F. B., Spiegelman, D., Franz, M., & van Dam, R. M. (2007) · PLoS Medicine · doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.0040261 · Cited by 734
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 33
- 10.1016/j.jand.2013.05.004 · DOI
- 10.1094/CCHEM-87-4-0292 · DOI
- 2010, Scientific opinion on the substantiation of health claims related to whole grain, EFSA J, 8, 1766
- 10.1016/j.annepidem.2013.03.010 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jpeds.2010.04.041 · DOI
- 10.1094/CCHEM-87-2-0167 · DOI
- 10.3945/an.113.005223 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.nutres.2010.10.013 · DOI
- 2002, McCance and Widdowson's The Composition of Foods
- 10.1080/01635589809514647 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1080/07315724.2000.10718969 · DOI
- 2012, National Diet and Nutrition Survey Headline Results from Years 1, 2 and 3 (Combined) of the Rolling Programme (2008/2009–2010/11)
- Jones AR (2007) Attitudinal and physiological responses to the consumption of wholegrain foods. PhD Thesis, Newcastle University.
- 2010, Dietary Guidelines for Americans 2010
- 10.1017/S0007114512004989 · DOI
- 10.3945/ajcn.2010.29417 · DOI
- 10.3945/jn.111.155325 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1136/bmj.d6617 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.3402/fnr.v58.22100 · DOI
- 10.1136/jech-2013-202885 · DOI
- Kantor, 2001, Choose a variety of grains daily, especially whole grains. A challenge for consumers, J Nutr, 131, 473s, 10.1093/jn/131.2.473S · DOI
- 10.5255/UKDA-SN-6533-4 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.numecd.2006.12.008 · DOI · Paper page
- 2012, National Diet and Nutrition Survey Headline Results from Years 1, 2 and 3 (Combined) of the Rolling Programme (2008/2009–2010/11). Appendix B: Weighting the NDNS Core Sample
- 10.1017/S1368980012003205 · DOI
- 10.3945/ajcn.113.067629 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1079/PNS2002219 · DOI
- 10.1079/BJN20051557 · DOI
- 10.1007/s10552-013-0215-z · DOI
- 1999, Whole grain definition, Cereal Foods World, 45, 79
- 10.1017/S0007114507659078 · DOI
- 10.1097/MOL.0b013e328011c6e0 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1467-3010.2006.00559.x · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Aune, D., Keum, N., Giovannucci, E., Fadnes, L. T., Boffetta, P., Greenwood, D. C., Tonstad, S., Vatten, L. J., Riboli, E., & Norat, T. (2016) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.i2716 · Cited by 1,013
Metadata
- Authors
- Mann, K. D., Pearce, M. S., McKevith, B., Thielecke, F., & Seal, C. J.
- Affiliations
- Newcastle University (GB)
- Nestlé (Switzerland) (CH)
- Corresponding author
- Seal, Chris J.
- Venue
- British Journal of Nutrition
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2015-04-23
- Volume
- 113
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 1643-1651
- ISSN
- 0007-1145 (ISSN-L)
- 1475-2662
- PMC
- PMC4462163
- OpenAlex
- W2136083699
- Cited by
- 101
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 7
- FWCI
- 12.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Locations
- British Journal Of Nutrition (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- reroDoc Digital Library (submittedVersion)
- Newcastle University ePrints (Newcastle Univesity) (cc-by)
- Funders
- National Institute for Health and Care Research
- University College London
- Cereal Partners Worldwide
- Medical Research Council
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Food composition and properties
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Nutritional Studies and Diet
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Nutrition, Health, and Society Studies
- Keywords
- whole grain intake, whole grains, dietary intake, energy-adjusted intake, socioeconomic status, age differences, adolescents, young adults, non-communicable disease prevention, dietary guidelines, UK diet, National Diet and Nutrition Survey
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Age Factors, Aged, Edible Grain, Cross-Sectional Studies, Diet Surveys, Dietary Fiber, Female, Follow-Up Studies, United Kingdom, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Patient Compliance, Socioeconomic Factors, Cohort Studies, Diet Records, Nutrition Policy, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review