Cited by 317Microbial Metabolites in Food BiotechnologyGut microbiota and healthProbiotics and Fermented Foods

Influence of galacto-oligosaccharide mixture (B-GOS) on gut microbiota, immune parameters and metabonomics in elderly persons

Open access
Vulevic, Jelena, Juric, Aleksandra, Walton, Gemma E., Claus, Sandrine P., Tzortzis, George, Toward, Ruth E., Gibson, Glenn R.·2015·British Journal of Nutrition

Abstract

It is recognised that ageing induces various changes to the human colonic microbiota. Most relevant is a reduction in bifidobacteria, which is a health-positive genus. Prebiotics, such as galacto-oligosaccharides (GOS), are dietary ingredients that selectively fortify beneficial gut microbial groups. Therefore, they have the potential to reverse the age-related decline in bifidobacteria and modulate associated health parameters. We assessed the effect of GOS mixture (Bimuno (B-GOS)) on gut microbiota, markers of immune function and metabolites in forty elderly (age 65–80 years) volunteers in a randomised, double-blind, placebo (maltodextrin)-controlled, cross-over study. The intervention periods consisted of 10 weeks with daily doses of 5·5 g/d with a 4-week washout period in between. Blood and faecal samples were collected for the analyses of faecal bacterial populations and immune and metabolic biomarkers. B-GOS consumption led to significant increases in bacteroides and bifidobacteria, the latter correlating with increased lactic acid in faecal waters. Higher IL-10, IL-8, natural killer cell activity and C-reactive protein and lower IL-1β were also observed. Administration of B-GOS to elderly volunteers may be useful in positively affecting the microbiota and some markers of immune function associated with ageing.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0007114515001889

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • B-GOS administration reduced proinflammatory cytokines with increase in IL-10 and IL-8.

    “Moreover, they also reported administration of B-GOS® resulted in a reduction in proinflammatory cytokines with an increase in both IL-10 and IL-8, anti-inflammatory cytokines (Vulevic et al., 2015).”

    From The Microbiota-Gut-Brain Axis (2019) · cites this paper as Vulevic et al., 2015

    The cytokine-production results report higher IL-10 and IL-8 and lower IL-1β after 10 weeks of B-GOS than placebo. They report no difference in IL-6 or TNF-α, so the claim overstates the reduction in proinflammatory cytokines. The Discussion calls IL-10 anti-inflammatory but describes IL-8 as a neutrophil chemo-attractant, not an anti-inflammatory cytokine. (LLM, conf=0.90)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • B-GOS administration in elderly increased Bacteroides and Bifidobacterium spp. with elevated lactic acid in fecal water.

    “Administration of B-GOS® in an elderly population reported a significant increase in Bacteroides and Bifidobacterium spp. with elevated levels of lactic acid in fecal water.”

    From The Microbiota-Gut-Brain Axis (2019) · cites this paper as Vulevic et al., 2015

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Brown H & Prescott R (2006) Applied Mixed Models in Medicine, 2nd ed. Chichester: Wiley.
  2. Senn SS (2002) Cross-over Trials in Clinical Research, 2nd ed. Chichester: Wiley.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Vulevic, J., Juric, A., Walton, G. E., Claus, S. P., Tzortzis, G., Toward, R. E., & Gibson, G. R.
Affiliations
University of Reading (GB)
Corresponding author
Vulevic, Jelena
Venue
British Journal of Nutrition
Published
2015-07-28
Volume
114
Issue
4
Pages
586-595
ISSN
  • 0007-1145 (ISSN-L)
  • 1475-2662
OpenAlex
W2136852526
Cited by
317
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 30 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 31 · 2022: 40 · 2021: 50 · 2020: 33 · 2019: 27 · 2018: 25 · 2017: 23 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 2
FWCI
21.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • British Journal Of Nutrition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
University of Reading
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Microbial Metabolites in Food Biotechnology
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gut microbiota and health
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Probiotics and Fermented Foods
Keywords
galactooligosaccharides, prebiotics, gut microbiota, aging, older adults, Bifidobacterium, Bacteroides, immune function, cytokines, natural killer cells, C-reactive protein, fecal metabolites, lactic acid, metabolomics
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Aging, Bacteria, Bacteroides, Bifidobacterium, C-Reactive Protein, Double-Blind Method, Feces, Female, Galactose, Humans, Immune System, Interleukins, Killer Cells, Natural, Male, Oligosaccharides, Biomarkers, Cross-Over Studies, Lactic Acid, Gastrointestinal Tract, Metabolomics, Prebiotics, Microbiota

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review