Cited by 89Probiotics and Fermented FoodsReproductive tract infections researchInfant Nutrition and Health

Immune-stimulating effects of lactic acid bacteria in vivo and in vitro

Open access
Elmadfa, Ibrahim, Klein, Petra, Meyer, Alexa L.·2010·Proceedings of the Nutrition Society

Abstract

The health-promoting effects of lactic acid bacteria (LAB) are well recognised, making them a popular functional food ingredient. Commercially available probiotic products are often promoted as capable of improving immune defences also in healthy subjects. However, while strain-specific differences exist in the effects of LAB, conventional yoghurt bacteria have proved beneficial as well. For comparing the immunological effects of conventional and probiotic LAB, young healthy women received either a commercially available probiotic fermented milk product or a conventional yoghurt for four weeks. Both treatments showed comparable effects resulting in a stronger immunological reaction to stimuli (natural cytotoxicity against cancer cells, mitogen-induced T-lymphocyte activation and stimulated cytokine production). To study the mechanisms behind these effects, conventional (Lactobacillus delbrueckii) and probiotic (Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG), LAB were compared in vitro at the cellular level. Interestingly, L. rhamnosus GG was more potent in inducing maturation of dendritic cells (DC) that play a substantial role in directing the immune response to stimuli. In turn, L. delbrueckii provoked a higher secretion of proinflammatory cytokines as well as IL-10. These effects were, however, observed only after direct incubation of DC and LAB, not when both were separated by a layer of enterocyte-like Caco-2 cells. LAB also induced cytokine secretion in peripheral blood mononuclear cells in a similar manner and this effect was reduced in a Caco-2 cell model, suggesting a modulating influence of gut epithelial cells. While both conventional and probiotic strains modulate the immune response, specific properties may offer therapeutic options in the treatment of certain diseases.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0029665110001710

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Humans likely respond to psychosocial stress with gut microbiome responses comparable to, if distinct from, those of laboratory animals.

    “it seems likely that humans respond to psychosocial stress with responses that are comparable to, if distinct from, the reactions of laboratory animals.”

    From The Gut Microbiome and the Brain (2014) · cites this paper as [123]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Elmadfa, I., Klein, P., & Meyer, A. L.
Affiliations
University of Vienna (AT)
Corresponding author
Elmadfa, Ibrahim
Venue
Proceedings of the Nutrition Society
Published
2010-06-16
Volume
69
Issue
3
Pages
416-420
ISSN
  • 0029-6651 (ISSN-L)
  • 1475-2719
OpenAlex
W2009513610
Cited by
89
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 11
FWCI
12.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of The Nutrition Society (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Phaidra (Universität Wien) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
Danone
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Probiotics and Fermented Foods
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Microbiology › Reproductive tract infections research
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Infant Nutrition and Health
Keywords
lactic acid bacteria, probiotics, immunostimulation, Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG, Lactobacillus delbrueckii, dendritic cell maturation, cytokine production, IL-10, natural cytotoxicity, T cell activation, Caco-2 cells, intestinal epithelial barrier, fermented milk, yogurt, functional foods
MeSH terms
Adult, Cell Differentiation, Dendritic Cells, Female, Humans, Immunologic Factors, Intestinal Mucosa, Lactobacillus, Leukocytes, Mononuclear, Cytokines, Interleukin-10, Inflammation Mediators, Caco-2 Cells, Probiotics, Cultured Milk Products, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review