Cited by 102Personality Traits and PsychologySuicide and Self-Harm StudiesChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development

The protective role of trait anxiety: a longitudinal cohort study

LEE, W. E., WADSWORTH, M. E. J., HOTOPF, M.·2006·Psychological Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Most research has indicated that neuroticism (or trait anxiety) is associated with only negative outcomes. Such a common, heritable and variable trait is expected to have beneficial as well as detrimental effects. We tested the hypothesis that trait anxiety in childhood reduces the risk of dying from accidental causes in early adult life. METHOD: A longitudinal, population-based, birth cohort study of 4,070 men and women born in the UK in 1946. Trait anxiety as judged by teachers when the participants were 13 and 15 years old, and the neuroticism scale of a Maudsley Personality Inventory (MPI) when the participants were 16 years old. Outcomes were deaths, deaths from accidents, non-fatal accidents, and non-fatal accidents requiring medical intervention. RESULTS: Adolescents with low trait anxiety had higher rates of accident mortality to age 25 [low anxiety at 13, hazard ratio (HR) 5.9, low anxiety at 15, HR 1.8]. Low trait anxiety in adolescence was associated with decreased non-accidental mortality after age 25 (low anxiety at 13, HR 0; low anxiety at 15, HR 0.7; low neuroticism at 16, HR 0.7). CONCLUSIONS: High trait anxiety measured in adolescence is associated with reduced accidents and accidental death in early adulthood but higher rates of non-accidental mortality in later life.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0033291705006847

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Adolescents with higher levels of trait anxiety have reduced risk of mortality from accidents in later life.

    “Adolescents with higher levels of trait anxiety, for example, are found to have reduced risk of mortality from accidents in later life [24].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
LEE, W. E., WADSWORTH, M. E. J., & HOTOPF, M.
Affiliations
  • King's College London (GB)
  • University College London (GB)
Venue
Psychological Medicine
Published
2006-01-05
Volume
36
Issue
3
Pages
345-351
ISSN
  • 0033-2917 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-8978
OpenAlex
W2032876276
Cited by
102
References
15
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 6
FWCI
5.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychological Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Wellcome Trust
  • Medical Research Council
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
Keywords
trait anxiety, neuroticism, accidental death, accident mortality, non-accidental mortality, adolescence, early adulthood, Maudsley Personality Inventory, birth cohort
MeSH terms
Accidents, Adolescent, Adult, Age Factors, Anxiety Disorders, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Personality Inventory, Population Surveillance, Sampling Studies, Cohort Studies, Observer Variation, Incidence, Sex Distribution

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review