Cited by 123Nursing care and researchAmyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis ResearchFamily Caregiving in Mental Illness

Predictors of psychological distress in carers of people with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: a longitudinal study

GOLDSTEIN, L. H., ATKINS, L., LANDAU, S., BROWN, R., LEIGH, P. N.·2006·Psychological Medicine

Abstract

Background. The majority of people providing informal care for people with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) are spouses. This prospective study set out to examine changes in and predictors of psychological distress in spouse carers of people with ALS. Method. Fifty spouse carers of people with ALS underwent an initial interview and at least 21 underwent two further interviews, at median intervals of approximately 5–6 months. They rated the functional impact of their partner's ALS on everyday activities and everyday cognitive, emotional and behavioural changes that might have occurred in the person with ALS. They also rated their own social support and marital relationship, and completed measures of mood, burden and strain. The ALS Severity Scale was also completed for their partner with ALS. Results. Over time, carers' psychological distress (a global measure combining mood, burden and strain) increased significantly. Initially carers' psychological distress was best predicted by the psychosocial impact of their spouse/partners' ALS, the extent to which their partner demonstrated emotional lability and how many other people were considered as dependents of the carer. Subsequently, carer distress was best predicted by an initial measure of negative social support and by their initial satisfaction with their social relationships. Conclusions. Despite the significant physical impairment associated with ALS, psychosocial factors appear important in determining short- and longer-term psychological well-being in carers of people with ALS and may help clinicians to predict which carers are likely to experience psychological difficulties as part of their caring role.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0033291706007124

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 31 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
GOLDSTEIN, L. H., ATKINS, L., LANDAU, S., BROWN, R., & LEIGH, P. N.
Affiliations
King's College London (GB)
Venue
Psychological Medicine
Published
2006-02-21
Volume
36
Issue
6
Pages
865-875
ISSN
  • 0033-2917 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-8978
OpenAlex
W2044553216
Cited by
123
References
31
Citations by year
2025: 5 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 8
FWCI
12.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychological Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Nursing care and research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Family Caregiving in Mental Illness
Keywords
amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, psychological distress, informal care, caregiver burden, emotional lability, social support, marital relationships, predictors of distress, psychosocial impact, caregiver well-being
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis, Depressive Disorder, Major, Major Depressive Disorder, Female, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Middle Aged, Predictive Value of Tests, Prognosis, Prospective Studies, Psychology, Caregivers, Cost of Illness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review