Cited by 165Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorGenetic Associations and EpidemiologyStress Responses and Cortisol

The BDNF Val66Met polymorphism impacts parahippocampal and amygdala volume in healthy humans: incremental support for a genetic risk factor for depression

Montag, C., Weber, B., Fliessbach, K., Elger, C., Reuter, M.·2009·Psychological Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The role of the brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) in the pathogenesis of affective disorders such as depression has been controversial. Mounting evidence comes from structural imaging, that the functional BDNF Val66Met polymorphism influences the hippocampal volume with carriers of the 66Met allele (Val/Met and Met/Met group) having smaller hippocampi. Given that stress-induced atrophy of the hippocampus is associated with the pathogenesis of affective disorders, the functional BDNF Val66Met polymorphism could be an incremental risk factor. METHOD: Eighty-seven healthy Caucasian participants underwent structural imaging and were genotyped for the BDNF Val66Met polymorphism. Data were analysed by means of voxel-based morphometry (VBM). RESULTS: Region of interest (ROI) analyses revealed an association between the 66Met allele and smaller parahippocampal volumes and a smaller right amygdala. In addition, the whole-brain analysis showed that the thalamus, fusiformus gyrus and several parts of the frontal gyrus were smaller in 66Met allele carriers. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that the impact of the BDNF Val66Met polymorphism is not confined to the hippocampus but also extends to the parahippocampal gyrus and the amygdala.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0033291709005509

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Montag, C., Weber, B., Fliessbach, K., Elger, C., & Reuter, M.
Affiliations
  • University of Bonn (DE)
  • University Hospital Bonn (DE)
Corresponding author
Montag, C.
Venue
Psychological Medicine
Published
2009-04-01
Volume
39
Issue
11
Pages
1831-1839
ISSN
  • 0033-2917 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-8978
OpenAlex
W2099280287
Cited by
165
References
4
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 13
FWCI
6.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychological Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
Keywords
BDNF Val66Met polymorphism, brain-derived neurotrophic factor, parahippocampal gyrus, amygdala, hippocampal volume, brain structure, genetic risk factors, depression, thalamus, fusiform gyrus, frontal gyrus, voxel-based morphometry
MeSH terms
Adult, Alleles, Amygdala, Atrophy, Brain, Brain Mapping, Depressive Disorder, Dominance, Cerebral, Female, Frontal Lobe, Genotype, Genetic Carrier Screening, Hippocampus, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Polymorphism, Genetic, Reference Values, Risk Factors, Thalamus, Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Parahippocampal Gyrus, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review