Cited by 39Schizophrenia research and treatmentAction Observation and SynchronizationMental Health and Psychiatry

You looking at me?: Interpreting social cues in schizophrenia

White, T. P., Borgan, F., Ralley, O., Shergill, S. S.·2016·Psychological Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Deficits in the perception of social cues are common in schizophrenia and predict functional outcome. While effective communication depends on deciphering both verbal and non-verbal features, work on non-verbal communication in the disorder is scarce. METHOD: This behavioural study of 29 individuals with schizophrenia and 25 demographically matched controls used silent video-clips to examine gestural identification, its contextual modulation and related metacognitive representations. RESULTS: In accord with our principal hypothesis, we observed that individuals with schizophrenia exhibited a preserved ability to identify archetypal gestures and did not differentially infer communicative intent from incidental movements. However, patients were more likely than controls to perceive gestures as self-referential when confirmatory evidence was ambiguous. Furthermore, the severity of their current hallucinatory experience inversely predicted their confidence ratings associated with these self-referential judgements. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest a deficit in the contextual refinement of social-cue processing in schizophrenia that is potentially attributable to impaired monitoring of a mirror mechanism underlying intentional judgements, or to an incomplete semantic representation of gestural actions. Non-verbal communication may be improved in patients through psychotherapeutic interventions that include performance and perception of gestures in group interactions.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0033291715001622

Cites

75 of 75 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Individuals with schizophrenia are more likely to perceive ambiguous communication signals as self-referred.

    “also showing that individuals with SCZ are more likely to perceive ambiguous communication signals as self-referred (White et al., 2016).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
White, T. P., Borgan, F., Ralley, O., & Shergill, S. S.
Affiliations
University of Birmingham (GB)
Corresponding author
Shergill, S. S.
Venue
Psychological Medicine
Published
2015-09-04
Volume
46
Issue
1
Pages
149-160
ISSN
  • 0033-2917 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-8978
OpenAlex
W2111815604
Cited by
39
References
75
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 1
FWCI
3.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychological Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust
  • Maudsley Charity
  • NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust/Institute of Cancer Research
  • National Institutes of Health
  • Medical Research Council
  • National Institute of Mental Health
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Action Observation and Synchronization
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Mental Health and Psychiatry
Keywords
schizophrenia, social cue processing, nonverbal communication, gesture perception, metacognition, contextual modulation, hallucinations, mirror mechanism, communicative intention, functional outcome
MeSH terms
Metacognition, Adult, Cues, Female, Gestures, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Psychotic Disorders, Schizophrenia, Social Perception

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review