Cited by 28Neurological disorders and treatmentsObsessive-Compulsive Spectrum DisordersPersonality Disorders and Psychopathology

Deep brain stimulation of the supero-lateral branch of the medial forebrain bundle does not lead to changes in personality in patients suffering from severe depression

Open access
Bewernick, Bettina H., Kilian, Hannah M., Schmidt, Klaudius, Reinfeldt, Ruth E., Kayser, Sarah, Coenen, Volker A., Markett, Sebastian, Schlaepfer, Thomas E.·2018·Psychological Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Reports of changes in patients' social behavior during deep brain stimulation (DBS) raised the question whether DBS induces changes in personality. This study explored if (1) DBS is associated with changes in personality in patients suffering from treatment-resistant depression (TRD), (2) how personality dimensions and depression are associated, and (3) if TRD patients' self-ratings of personality are valid. METHODS: TRD patients were assessed before DBS (n = 30), 6 months (t2, n = 21), 2 (t3, n = 17) and 5 years (t4, n = 11) after the initiation of DBS of the supero-lateral branch of the medial forebrain bundle (slMFB-DBS). Personality was measured with the NEO-Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI), depression severity with Hamilton (HDRS), and Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS). RESULTS: Personality dimensions did not change with slMFB-DBS compared with baseline. Extraversion was negatively correlated with HDRS28 (r = -0.48, p < 0.05) and MADRS (r = -0.45, p < 0.05) at t2. Inter-rater reliability was high for the NEO-FFI at baseline (Cronbach's α = 0.74) and at t4 (α = 0.65). Extraversion [t(29) = -5.20; p < 0.001] and openness to experience [t(29) = -6.96; p < 0.001] differed statistically significant from the normative sample, and did not predict the antidepressant response. CONCLUSIONS: slMFB-DBS was not associated with a change in personality. The severity of depression was associated with extraversion. Personality of TRD patients differed from the healthy population and did not change with response, indicating a possible scar effect. Self-ratings of personality seem valid to assess personality during TRD.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0033291718000296

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • These patients, in addition to another cohort (N = 21), were followed for a maximum of 5 years and showed significant response and remission rates at 6 months (N = 21, RS: 42.8%, RM: 38.1%), 2 years (N = 17, RS: 64.7%, RM: 47.1%), and 5 years (N = 11, RS: 72.27%, RM: 72.7%).

    “These patients, in addition to another cohort (N = 21), were followed for a maximum of 5 years and showed significant response and remission rates at 6 months (N = 21, RS: 42.8%, RM: 38.1%), 2 years (N = 17, RS: 64.7%, RM: 47.1%), and 5 years (N = 11, RS: 72.27%, RM: 72.7%) [67].”

    From Deep brain stimulation for depression. (2022) · cites this paper as [67]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bewernick, B. H., Kilian, H. M., Schmidt, K., Reinfeldt, R. E., Kayser, S., Coenen, V. A., Markett, S., & Schlaepfer, T. E.
Affiliations
  • University Hospital Bonn (DE)
  • University Medical Center Freiburg (DE)
  • University of Cologne (DE)
  • University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz (DE)
  • University of Bonn (DE)
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
Corresponding author
Schlaepfer, Thomas E.
Venue
Psychological Medicine
Published
2018-03-01
Volume
48
Issue
16
Pages
2684-2692
ISSN
  • 0033-2917 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-8978
OpenAlex
W2792691363
Cited by
28
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 1
FWCI
1.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Psychological Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Kölner Universitäts PublikationsServer (Universität zu Köln) (publishedVersion)
  • edoc Publication server (Humboldt University of Berlin) (submittedVersion)
  • edoc Publication server (Humboldt University of Berlin)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Neurological disorders and treatments
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
Keywords
deep brain stimulation, medial forebrain bundle, treatment-resistant depression, personality change, extraversion, openness to experience, NEO-FFI, depression severity, antidepressant response
MeSH terms
Adult, Extraversion, Psychological, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Medial Forebrain Bundle, Middle Aged, Personality, Self-Assessment, Severity of Illness Index, Deep Brain Stimulation, Depressive Disorder, Treatment-Resistant

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review