Cited by 218Personality Traits and PsychologyAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPersonality Disorders and Psychopathology

Personality self-reports are concurrently reliable and valid during acute depressive episodes

Costa, Paul T., Bagby, R. Michael, Herbst, Jeffrey H., McCrae, Robert R.·2005·Journal of Affective Disorders

Abstract

Background It is alleged that depression distorts the assessment of general personality traits. To test that hypothesis, we examined scores on the Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PI-R) administered to acutely depressed patients at baseline and 14 to 26 weeks after treatment with antidepressant medication.Method Two hundred and fifty patients completed the NEO-PI-R at baseline, 109 patients after 14 to 26 weeks of antidepressant pharmacotherapy. 48 patients (49.5%) were identified as responders while 49 (50.5%) were identified as non-responders. The remaining 12 patients were excluded because they met HRSD response criteria but not the SCID-I MDD criteria at treatment completion.Results At baseline, NEO-PI-R scales showed high internal consistency and replicated the normative factor structure, suggesting that psychometric properties were preserved. Among non-responders, retest correlations were uniformly high (rs=.50 to .88) and mean levels showed little change, providing evidence for the consistency of personality self-reports during an acute depressive episode. NEO-PI-R scales showed construct validity in the concurrent prediction of a number of clinical criteria. Effective treatment had significant effects on the mean levels of neuroticism, which decreased, and extraversion, openness, and conscientiousness, which increased.Limitations The participants were from a clinical database and were not randomly assigned for the treatment.Conclusions The results suggest that the effect of acute depression is to amplify somewhat the personality profile of people prone to depression. Rather than regard these depression-caused changes in assessed personality trait levels as a distortion, we interpret them as accurate reflections of the current condition of the individual. Personality traits have biological bases, and when they are changed (by disease or therapeutic interventions) trait levels change.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jad.2005.06.010

Cites

60 of 60 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Costa, P. T., Bagby, R. M., Herbst, J. H., & McCrae, R. R.
Affiliations
  • National Institutes of Health (US)
  • Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (CA)
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (US)
Corresponding author
Costa, Paul T.
Venue
Journal of Affective Disorders
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2005-12
Volume
89
Issue
1-3
Pages
45-55
ISSN
0165-0327 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2172124190
Cited by
218
References
60
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 22 · 2012: 10
FWCI
9.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Affective Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
Keywords
personality traits, acute depression, depressive episodes, NEO-PI-R, antidepressant treatment, treatment response, neuroticism, Big Five personality traits, trait stability, construct validity, test-retest reliability
MeSH terms
Acute Disease, Antidepressive Agents, Major Depressive Disorder, Humans, Personality Inventory, Psychometrics, Reference Values, Reproducibility of Results, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review