Cited by 270Impact of Technology on AdolescentsGambling Behavior and TreatmentsSexuality, Behavior, and Technology

A longitudinal study on psychosocial causes and consequences of Internet gaming disorder in adolescence

Wartberg, Lutz, Kriston, Levente, Zieglmeier, Matthias, Lincoln, Tania, Kammerl, Rudolf·2019·Psychological Medicine

Abstract

Background: In 2013, Internet gaming disorder (IGD) was incorporated in the current version of the DSM-5. IGD refers to a problematic use of video games. Longitudinal studies on the etiology of IGD are lacking. Furthermore, it is currently unclear to which extent associated psychopathological problems are causes or consequences of IGD. In the present survey, longitudinal associations between IGD and adolescent and parental mental health were investigated for the first time, as well as the temporal stability of IGD. Methods: In a cross-lagged panel design study, family dyads (adolescent with a parent each) were examined in 2016 (t1) and again 1 year later (2017, t2). Overall, 1095 family dyads were assessed at t1 and 985 dyads were re-assessed at t2 with standardized measures of IGD and several aspects of adolescent and parental mental health. Data were analyzed with structural equation modeling (SEM). Results: Male gender, a higher level of hyperactivity/inattention, self-esteem problems and IGD at t1 were predictors of IGD at t2. IGD at t1 was a predictor for adolescent emotional distress at t2. Overall, 357 out of the 985 adolescents received a diagnosis of IGD at t1 or t2: 142 (14.4%) at t1 and t2, 100 (10.2%) only at t1, and 115 (11.7%) only at t2. Conclusions: Hyperactivity/inattention and self-esteem problems seem to be important for the development of IGD. We found first empirical evidence that IGD could prospectively contribute to a deterioration of adolescent mental health. Only a subgroup of affected adolescents showed IGD consistently over 1 year.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s003329171800082x

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wartberg, L., Kriston, L., Zieglmeier, M., Lincoln, T., & Kammerl, R.
Affiliations
  • University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (DE)
  • Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (DE)
  • Universität Hamburg (DE)
Corresponding author
Wartberg, Lutz
Venue
Psychological Medicine
Published
2018-04-06
Volume
49
Issue
2
Pages
287-294
ISSN
  • 0033-2917 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-8978
OpenAlex
W2795455895
Cited by
270
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 23 · 2025: 49 · 2024: 40 · 2023: 39 · 2022: 34 · 2021: 39 · 2020: 32 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 2
FWCI
48.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychological Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Gambling Behavior and Treatments
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology
Keywords
internet gaming disorder, adolescents, psychosocial etiology, hyperactivity/inattention, self-esteem problems, emotional distress, parental mental health, family dyads, temporal stability, DSM-5
MeSH terms
Psychological Distress, Adolescent, Adolescent Behavior, Adult, Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Child, Female, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Self Concept, Behavior, Addictive, Video Games, Internet

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review