Cited by 46Impact of Technology on AdolescentsGambling Behavior and TreatmentsDigital Games and Media

Comment on the global gaming industry's statement on ICD‐11 gaming disorder: a corporate strategy to disregard harm and deflect social responsibility?

Open access
King, Daniel L., Gaming Industry Response Consortium·2018·Addiction

Abstract

Comment on the global gaming industry's statement on ICD-11 gaming disorder: a corporate strategy to disregard harm and deflect social responsibility?

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/add.14388

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
King, D. L., & Gaming Industry Response Consortium
Affiliations
The University of Adelaide (AU)
Corresponding author
King, Daniel L.
Venue
Addiction
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2018-08-05
Volume
113
Issue
11
Pages
2145-2146
ISSN
  • 0965-2140 (ISSN-L)
  • 1360-0443
OpenAlex
W2884319031
Cited by
46
References
17
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 2
FWCI
17.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Addiction (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • SERVAL (Université de Lausanne) (publishedVersion)
  • Archive ouverte UNIGE (University of Geneva) (publishedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
  • Open Repository and Bibliography (University of Luxembourg) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • Digital Access to Libraries (submittedVersion)
  • Adelaide Research & Scholarship (AR&S) (University of Adelaide) (submittedVersion)
  • Deakin Research Online (Deakin University) (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • IRIS (submittedVersion)
  • Iris (University of Trento) (submittedVersion)
  • Lithuanian University of Health Sciences (submittedVersion)
  • Archive ouverte UNIGE (University of Geneva) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich)
Funders
Discovery Early Career Researcher Award (DECRA) (DE170101198)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Gambling Behavior and Treatments
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Digital Games and Media
Keywords
gambling addiction, corporate social responsibility, industry advocacy, harm reduction, gambling harm
MeSH terms
Humans, Industry, Social Responsibility, Behavior, Addictive, Video Games, International Classification of Diseases

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review