Cited by 328Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesNeuroendocrine regulation and behavior

Reward, Addiction, and Emotion Regulation Systems Associated With Rejection in Love

Fisher, Helen E., Brown, Lucy L., Aron, Arthur, Strong, Greg, Mashek, Debra·2010·Journal of Neurophysiology

Abstract

Romantic rejection causes a profound sense of loss and negative affect. It can induce clinical depression and in extreme cases lead to suicide and/or homicide. To begin to identify the neural systems associated with this natural loss state, we used functional magnetic resonance imaging to study 10 women and 5 men who had recently been rejected by a partner but reported they were still intensely “in love.” Participants alternately viewed a photograph of their rejecting beloved and a photograph of a familiar, individual, interspersed with a distraction-attention task. Their responses while looking at their rejecter included love, despair, good, and bad memories, and wondering why this happened. Activation specific to the image of the beloved occurred in areas associated with gains and losses, craving and emotion regulation and included the ventral tegmental area (VTA) bilaterally, ventral striatum, medial and lateral orbitofrontal/prefrontal cortex, and cingulate gyrus. Compared with data from happily-in-love individuals, the regional VTA activation suggests that mesolimbic reward/survival systems are involved in romantic passion regardless of whether one is happily or unhappily in love. Forebrain activations associated with motivational relevance, gain/loss, cocaine craving, addiction, and emotion regulation suggest that higher-order systems subject to experience and learning also may mediate the rejection reaction. The results show activation of reward systems, previously identified by monetary stimuli, in a natural, endogenous, negative emotion state. Activation of areas involved in cocaine addiction may help explain the obsessive behaviors associated with rejection in love.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1152/jn.00784.2009

Cites

94 of 94 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The Social Rejection task was modeled after prior fMRI research using photographs to elicit powerful emotions and behavioral research indicating that cueing recall of autobiographical rejection experiences effectively reactivates social rejection-related distress.

    “The Social Rejection task was modeled after ( i ) fMRI research that used photographs provided by participants to elicit powerful emotions, including maternal love, romantic love, and rejection (8, 44 -46), and ( ii ) behavioral research indicating that cueing people to recall autobiographical rejection experiences is an effective way of reactivating social rejection-related distress (e.g., refs.”
  • Romantic love, both while someone is actively in love and after they have experienced rejection from a break-up, but not sexual arousal, involves ventral tegmental activation, whereas sexual arousal, but not love, involves ventral striatal activation.

    “For example, romantic love, both while someone is actively in love and after they have experienced rejection from a break-up, but not sexual arousal, involves ventral tegmental activation (generally associated with pleasure, focused attention, and motivation to pursue rewards), whereas sexual arousal, but not love, involves ventral striatal activation (associated with motivation and predictive”
  • Both romantic love and sex are goal-oriented motivations accompanied by strong emotional responses, by activating dopamine-rich, reward processing and motivational systems.

    “By activating dopamine-rich, reward processing and motivational systems, both romantic love and sex are goal-oriented motivations accompanied by strong emotional responses (Aron et al., 2005, Fisher et al., 2010).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fisher, H. E., Brown, L. L., Aron, A., Strong, G., & Mashek, D.
Affiliations
  • Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US)
  • Albert Einstein College of Medicine (US)
  • Stony Brook University (US)
Corresponding author
Brown, Lucy L.
Venue
Journal of Neurophysiology
Published
2010-07
Volume
104
Issue
1
Pages
51-60
ISSN
  • 0022-3077 (ISSN-L)
  • 1522-1598
OpenAlex
W2159246984
Cited by
328
References
94
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 31 · 2020: 103 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 20 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 15
FWCI
5.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Neurophysiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior
Keywords
romantic rejection, love, reward systems, addiction, emotion regulation, ventral tegmental area, ventral striatum, orbitofrontal cortex, cingulate gyrus, cocaine craving, mesolimbic system, loss, obsessive behavior
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Brain, Brain Mapping, Emotions, Female, Grief, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Love, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Obsessive Behavior, Pair Bond, Photic Stimulation, Rejection, Psychology, Reward, Time Factors, Behavior, Addictive, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review