Cited by 641Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesFunctional Brain Connectivity StudiesNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

Precision psychiatry: a neural circuit taxonomy for depression and anxiety

Open access
Williams, Leanne M·2016·The Lancet Psychiatry

Abstract

Although there have been tremendous advances in the understanding of human dysfunctions in the brain circuitry for self-reflection, emotion, and cognitive control, a brain-based taxonomy for mental disease is still lacking. As a result, these advances have not been translated into actionable clinical tools, and the language of brain circuits has not been incorporated into training programmes. To address this gap, I present this synthesis of published work, with a focus on functional imaging of circuit dysfunctions across the spectrum of mood and anxiety disorders. This synthesis provides the foundation for a taxonomy of putative types of dysfunction, which cuts across traditional diagnostic boundaries for depression and anxiety and includes instead distinct types of neural circuit dysfunction that together reflect the heterogeneity of depression and anxiety. This taxonomy is suited to specifying symptoms in terms of underlying neural dysfunction at the individual level and is intended as the foundation for building mechanistic research and ultimately guiding clinical practice.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s2215-0366(15)00579-9

Cites

74 of 74 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The neural, cognitive, information processing, and psychological patterns discussed above have broad transdiagnostic relevance, particularly with respect to other disorders of negative affect (e.g., anxiety, trauma-related conditions).

    “Likewise, the neural, cognitive, information processing, and psychological patterns discussed above have broad transdiagnostic relevance, particularly with respect to other disorders of negative affect (e.g., anxiety, trauma-related conditions) 140 -that likewise respond to pharmacologic interventions with plasticity-enhancing properties 141,142 .”

    From Neuroplasticity in cognitive and psychological mechanisms of depression: an integrative model (2020) · cites this paper as [140]

    The sections on the neural-circuit approach and negative-affect biotypes describe circuit dysfunction, attention, and emotional-processing patterns that cross depression and several anxiety diagnoses. They do not establish the same broad relevance for trauma-related conditions; PTSD appears in a cited study’s title, not in the paper’s account of its proposed biotypes. The available passages have no page numbers. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • A focus on establishing correlations across levels of analysis, both before and after administering plasticity-enhancing interventions, will help clarify the degree to which an integrative neuroplasticity model may be relevant to some individual forms of depression and negative affect, but not others.

    “Rather than assuming a unitary etiology, and a correspondingly uniform pathway to recovery from depression, a focus on establishing correlations across levels of analysis-both before and after administering plasticity-enhancing interventions-will help to clarify the degree to which an integrative neuroplasticity model may be relevant to some individual forms of depression and negative affect, but”

    From Neuroplasticity in cognitive and psychological mechanisms of depression: an integrative model (2020) · cites this paper as [140]

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Bipolar disorder involves difficulty maintaining a consistent hierarchical inference: neurotransmitter and modulatory systems that set precision (like NMDA, dopamine and serotonin) fluctuate abnormally, causing the brain to over-fit at times and under-fit at others.

    “One proposal is that bipolar disorder involves difficulty maintaining a consistent hierarchical inference: the neurotransmitter and modulatory systems that set precision (like NMDA, dopamine and serotonin) fluctuate abnormally, causing the brain to over-fit at times and under-fit at others (67).”

    From Predictive coding and neurocomputational psychiatry: a mechanistic framework for understanding mental disorders (2026) · cites this paper as [67]

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 0 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 2 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Clusters of individuals with neural network alterations have been identified in depression, psychotic disorders, and ADHD.

    “Indeed, clusters of individuals with neural network alterations have been identified in depression [7–8], psychotic disorders [9] and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD [10]).”
  • OCD's complex phenomenology likely reflects widespread abnormalities across multiple brain regions and circuits.

    “the complex phenomenology of the condition likely reflects widespread abnormalities across multiple brain regions and circuits encompassing a variety of emotional, cognitive, and behavioral domains, like most psychiatric disorders [5, 7].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Williams, L. M.
Affiliations
Stanford University (US)
Corresponding author
Williams, Leanne M
Venue
The Lancet Psychiatry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-05
Volume
3
Issue
5
Pages
472-480
ISSN
2215-0366 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2341692630
Cited by
641
References
74
Citations by year
2026: 77 · 2025: 73 · 2024: 90 · 2023: 79 · 2022: 70 · 2021: 74 · 2020: 69 · 2019: 53 · 2018: 24 · 2017: 24 · 2016: 7
FWCI
4.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Lancet Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health ((R01MH101496))
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Keywords
precision psychiatry, neural circuit dysfunction, depression, anxiety, mood disorders, anxiety disorders, functional neuroimaging, depression heterogeneity, individual differences
MeSH terms
Anxiety, Brain, Depression, Humans, Neural Pathways, Psychiatry

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review