Cited by 5

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 20 of the 20 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Effects of psychological treatment for depression among people not actively seeking help: a meta-analysis

Zhao, Ruiying, Amarnath, Arpana, Karyotaki, Eirini, Struijs, Sascha Y., Cuijpers, Pim·2022·Psychological Medicine

Abstract

Although psychological treatments have been found to be effective for depression in adults, many individuals with depression do not actively seek help. It is currently unclear whether psychological treatments are effective among those not actively seeking help. Besides, little is known about the proportion of patients who completed a screening questionnaire who end up in a clinical trial. Therefore, we conducted a meta-analysis of 52 randomized trials comparing psychotherapies for adults with a diagnosis or elevated symptoms of depression against control conditions (care-as-usual, waiting list, and other inactive treatment). Only studies recruiting participants who do not actively seek help (participants who have been recruited through screening instead of advertisements and clinical referrals) were included. To obtain an overall effect estimate of psychotherapy, we pooled all post-test differences with a random-effects model. We found that psychological treatments had a moderate to high effect on reducing depressive symptoms compared to control groups [g = 0.55; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.41–0.69]. Heterogeneity was high (I2 = 75%; 95% CI 68–80). At 12 months' follow-up, the effects were small but significant (6–8 months: g = 0.33; 95% CI 0.14–0.52; 9–12 months: g = 0.24; 95% CI 0.11–0.37). As a secondary outcome, we found that 13% of patients who completed a screening questionnaire met the inclusion criteria for depression and agreed to be randomized in the trial. Based on the current evidence, psychological treatments for depression might be effective for depressed patients who are not actively seeking help.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0033291722003518

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Fig. 1. Flowchart on the selection of studies.
Fig. 1. Flowchart on the selection of studies.CC BY-NC-SA · PubMed Central
Fig. 2. Forest plot of psychotherapy v. control conditions for adult depression: Hedges' g.
Fig. 2. Forest plot of psychotherapy v. control conditions for adult depression: Hedges' g.CC BY-NC-SA · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 20 references

Research works printed but not linked: 38

  1. Olkin, 1985, Statistical methods for meta-analysis
  2. 10.3399/bjgp09X395139 · DOI
  3. 10.4172/2376-127X.1000301 · DOI
  4. Thomas, 1992, A survey of links between mental health professionals and general practice in six district health authorities, The British Journal of General Practice: The Journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 42, 358
  5. 10.1016/S0006-3223(03)00639-5 · DOI
  6. Thombs, 2021, Does depression screening in primary care improve mental health outcomes?, BMJ, 374, 1
  7. 10.1089/jwh.2020.8862 · DOI · Paper page
  8. 10.1136/bmj.d5928 · DOI · Paper page
  9. 10.1038/s41598-018-21243-x · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.1136/bmj.315.7109.629 · DOI · Paper page
  11. 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60879-5 · DOI · Paper page
  12. 10.1371/journal.pone.0052654 · DOI
  13. 10.1002/1099-176X(200003)3:1<3::AID-MHP68>3.0.CO;2-H · DOI
  14. 10.1002/wps.20900 · DOI · Paper page
  15. 10.1016/0163-8343(96)00065-5 · DOI
  16. 10.1001/archfami.4.2.99 · DOI
  17. 10.1503/cmaj.111035 · DOI
  18. 10.1176/ps.2009.60.3.297 · DOI
  19. 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097 · DOI · Paper page
  20. Pratt, 2014, Depression in the U.S. household population, 2009–2012, NCHS Data Brief 2014,, 172, 1
  21. 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2006.09.014 · DOI
  22. 10.1001/jama.2015.18392 · DOI · Paper page
  23. 10.18637/jss.v036.i03 · DOI · Paper page
  24. 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2008.04.001 · DOI · Paper page
  25. Harrer, 2022, Doing meta-analysis with R: A hands-on guide
  26. 2017, Depression and other common mental disorders: Global health estimates
  27. 10.7326/0003-4819-136-10-200205210-00013 · DOI · Paper page
  28. 10.1136/ebmental-2019-300117 · DOI · Paper page
  29. 10.1002/jclp.20432 · DOI
  30. 10.1111/acps.13335 · DOI · Paper page
  31. 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31678-6 · DOI · Paper page
  32. 10.1136/bmj.327.7414.557 · DOI · Paper page
  33. 10.1111/j.0006-341X.2000.00455.x · DOI · Paper page
  34. 10.9778/cmajo.20130030 · DOI
  35. 10.1016/S0163-8343(96)00062-X · DOI
  36. 10.1186/1741-7015-8-38 · DOI · Paper page
  37. 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2013.01.012 · DOI
  38. Friedrich, 2017, Depression is the leading cause of disability around the world, JAMA, 317, 1517

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 5

Metadata

Authors
Zhao, R., Amarnath, A., Karyotaki, E., Struijs, S. Y., & Cuijpers, P.
Venue
Psychological Medicine
Published
2022-11-21
Pages
1-12
ISSN
  • 0033-2917
  • 1469-8978
Cited by
5
References
20
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Effects of psychological treatment for depression among people not actively seeking help: a meta-analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/s0033291722003518
The paper
Zhao, R., Amarnath, A., Karyotaki, E., Struijs, S. Y., & Cuijpers, P. (2022). Effects of psychological treatment for depression among people not actively seeking help: a meta-analysis. Psychological Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0033291722003518