The DOI matches its OpenAlex record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Mental fatigue and task control: Planning and preparation
Abstract
The effects of mental fatigue on planning and preparation for future actions were examined, using a task switching paradigm. Fatigue was induced by "time on task," with subjects performing a switch task continuously for 2 hr. Subjects had to alternate between tasks on every second trial, so that a new task set was required on every second trial. Manipulations of response-stimulus intervals (RSIs) were used to examine whether subjects prepared themselves for the task change. Behavioral measurements, event-related potentials (ERPs), and mood questionnaires were used to assess the effects of mental fatigue. Reaction times (RTs) were faster on trials in which no change in task set was required in comparison with switch trials, requiring a new task set. Long RSIs were used efficiently to prepare for the processing of subsequent stimuli. With increasing mental fatigue, preparation processes seemed to become less adequate and the number of errors increased. A clear poststimulus parietal negativity was observed on repetition trials, which reduced with time on task. This attention-related component was less pronounced in switch trials; instead, ERPs elicited in switch trials showed a clear frontal negativity. This negativity was also diminished by time on task. ERP differences between repetition and switch trials became smaller with increasing time on task.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Costs of a predictible switch between simple cognitive tasks.
Rogers, R. D., & Monsell, S. (1995) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: General · doi:10.1037/0096-3445.124.2.207 · Cited by 3,170
Speed-accuracy tradeoff and information processing dynamics
Wickelgren, W. A. (1977) · Acta Psychologica · doi:10.1016/0001-6918(77)90012-9 · Cited by 1,304
Influence of caffeine on information processing stages in well rested and fatigued subjects
Lorist, M. M., Snel, J., & Kok, A. (1994) · Psychopharmacology · doi:10.1007/bf02245217 · Cited by 133
Self-citation
Cited by
Sonnentag, S. (2003) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.88.3.518 · Cited by 1,851
An opportunity cost model of subjective effort and task performance
Kurzban, R., Duckworth, A., Kable, J. W., & Myers, J. (2013) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x12003196 · Cited by 1,381
Langner, R., & Eickhoff, S. B. (2013) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/a0030694 · Cited by 746
Mental fatigue and the control of cognitive processes: effects on perseveration and planning
van der Linden, D., Frese, M., & Meijman, T. F. (2003) · Acta Psychologica · doi:10.1016/s0001-6918(02)00150-6 · Cited by 646
Self-citationFrontal theta activity reflects distinct aspects of mental fatigue
Wascher, E., Rasch, B., Sänger, J., Hoffmann, S., Schneider, D., Rinkenauer, G., Heuer, H., & Gutberlet, I. (2014) · Biological Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.biopsycho.2013.11.010 · Cited by 454
Kamijo, K., Pontifex, M. B., O’Leary, K. C., Scudder, M. R., Wu, C.-T., Castelli, D. M., & Hillman, C. H. (2011) · Developmental Science · doi:10.1111/j.1467-7687.2011.01054.x · Cited by 365
Ackerman, P. L., & Kanfer, R. (2009) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied · doi:10.1037/a0015719 · Cited by 288
Computational and neurobiological mechanisms underlying cognitive flexibility
Badre, D., & Wagner, A. D. (2006) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0509550103 · Cited by 199
The impact of moderate sleep loss on neurophysiologic signals during working-memory task performance
Smith, M. E., McEvoy, L. K., & Gevins, A. (2002) · Sleep · doi:10.1093/sleep/25.7.56 · Cited by 157
Short-term mobilization of processing resources is revealed in the event-related potential
Falkenstein, M., Hoormann, J., Hohnsbein, J., & Kleinsorge, T. (2003) · Psychophysiology · doi:10.1111/1469-8986.00109 · Cited by 138
Mental fatigue impairs emotion regulation.
Grillon, C., Quispe-Escudero, D., Mathur, A., & Ernst, M. (2015) · Emotion · doi:10.1037/emo0000058 · Cited by 131
Cognitive cost as dynamic allocation of energetic resources
Christie, S. T., & Schrater, P. (2015) · Frontiers in Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnins.2015.00289 · Cited by 99
Neck cooling and cognitive performance following exercise-induced hyperthermia.
Lee, J. K. W., Koh, A. C. H., Koh, S. X. T., Liu, G. J. X., Nio, A. Q. X., & Fan, P. W. P. (2014) · European Journal of Applied Physiology · doi:10.1007/s00421-013-2774-9 · Cited by 100
Rozental, A., & Carlbring, P. (2013) · JMIR Research Protocols · doi:10.2196/resprot.2801 · Cited by 47
Wolff, N., Buse, J., Tost, J., Roessner, V., & Beste, C. (2017) · Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry · doi:10.1111/jcpp.12733 · Cited by 24
Do employees with burnout prefer low-effort performance strategies?
van Dam, A., Eling, P. A. T. M., Keijsers, G. P. J., & Becker, E. S. (2013) · IIE Transactions on Occupational Ergonomics and Human Factors · doi:10.1080/21577323.2013.828666 · Cited by 9
Objective but not subjective fatigue increases cognitive task avoidance
Benoit, C.-E., Solopchuk, O., Borragán, G., Carbonnelle, A., Van Durme, S., & Zénon, A. (2017) · doi:10.1101/208322 · Cited by 4
Metadata
- Authors
- Lorist, M. M., Klein, M., Nieuwenhuis, S., de Jong, R., Mulder, G., & Meijman, T. F.
- Venue
- Psychophysiology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2000-09-01
- Volume
- 37
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 614-625
- ISSN
- 0048-5772 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2156926719
- Cited by
- 453
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 2.02
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
