The DOI matches its Crossref record; 15 of the 15 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
EPILOGUE: A Framework for Investigating Oral and Written Corrective Feedback
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Levels of processing: A framework for memory research
Craik, F. I. M., & Lockhart, R. S. (1972) · Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior · doi:10.1016/s0022-5371(72)80001-x · Cited by 9,566
CORRECTIVE FEEDBACK AND LEARNER UPTAKE: Negotiation of Form in Communicative Classrooms
Lyster, R., & Ranta, L. (1997) · Studies in Second Language Acquisition · doi:10.1017/s0272263197001034 · Cited by 2,629
Effectiveness of L2 instruction: A research synthesis and quantitative meta-analysis
Norris, J. M., & Ortega, L. (2000) · Language Learning · doi:10.1111/0023-8333.00136 · Cited by 2,569
Schmidt, R. (2001) · Cognition and Second Language Instruction · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139524780.003 · Cited by 1,322
Evidence in support of written corrective feedback
Bitchener, J. (2008) · Journal of Second Language Writing · doi:10.1016/j.jslw.2007.11.004 · Cited by 871
DIFFERENTIAL EFFECTS OF PROMPTS AND RECASTS IN FORM-FOCUSED INSTRUCTION
Lyster, R. (2004) · Studies in Second Language Acquisition · doi:10.1017/s0272263104263021 · Cited by 826
The Psychology of the Language Learner
Dörnyei, Z. (2014) · doi:10.4324/9781410613349 · Cited by 700
Feedback, Noticing and Instructed Second Language Learning
Mackey, A. (2006) · Applied Linguistics · doi:10.1093/applin/ami051 · Cited by 536 · cited 2×
“Mackey ( 2006 ), for example, investigated learners’ perceptions of the gap between their own production and recasts by examining the learners’ online learning journals, conducting a stimulated recall, and administering questionnaires.”
Cognitive underpinnings of focus on form
Doughty, C. (2001) · Cognition and Second Language Instruction · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139524780.010 · Cited by 523
INTERACTIONAL FEEDBACK AND INSTRUCTIONAL COUNTERBALANCE
Lyster, R., & Mori, H. (2006) · Studies in Second Language Acquisition · doi:10.1017/s0272263106060128 · Cited by 506
Research works printed but not linked: 39
- Van Lier, 1988, The classroom and the language learner
- 10.1016/S1060-3743(99)80124-6 · DOI · Paper page
- Sheen, 2007, Conversational interaction in second language acquisition: A collection of empirical studies, 301
- 10.1002/j.1545-7249.2007.tb00059.x · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1191/1362168804lr146oa · DOI · Paper page
- Seedhouse, 2004, The interactional architecture of the language classroom: A conversation analysis perspective
- 10.1111/0026-7902.00107 · DOI · Paper page
- Rolin-Ianziti, The organization of delayed second language correction, Language Teaching Research
- 10.1002/9780470756492.ch19 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/1540-4781.00205 · DOI
- Nystrom, 1983, Classroom-oriented research in second language acquisition, 169
- 10.1017/S0272263107070039 · DOI · Paper page
- Schmidt, 1986, Talking to learn: Conversation in second language acquisition, 237
- 10.1111/j.1540-4781.1998.tb01211.x · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/S1060-3743(98)90017-0 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/j.1467-1770.1996.tb01238.x · DOI · Paper page
- Long, 2007, Problems in SLA, 75
- Krashen, 1982, Principles and practice in second language acquisition
- 10.1017/S0272263100011931 · DOI · Paper page
- Ellis, 2006, Themes in SLA research, 18
- 10.2307/3586773 · DOI · Paper page
- Allwright, 1975, On TESOL ‘75: New directions in second-language learning, teaching and bilingual education, 96
- Goldstein, 2001, On second language writing, 73
- 10.1111/j.1467-1770.1977.tb00290.x · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/j.1540-4781.2006.00465.x · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/0023-8333.00019 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/elt/ccn023 · DOI · Paper page
- Long, 1996, Handbook of second language acquisition, 413
- 10.1017/CBO9781139524551.016 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/j.1540-4781.1994.tb02064.x · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1177/1362168808089924 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1017/S027226310000992X · DOI
- Schmidt, 1994, Deconstructing consciousness in search of useful definitions for applied linguistics, AILA Review, 11, 11
- DeKeyser, 1998, Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition, 42
- Ellis, 2008, The study of second language acquisition
- 10.1016/S1060-3743(99)80110-6 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1017/CBO9781139524742.012 · DOI
- 10.1177/136216880000400103 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/1467-9922.00039 · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
Student engagement with teacher and automated feedback on L2 writing
Zhang, Z. (., & Hyland, K. (2018) · Assessing Writing · doi:10.1016/j.asw.2018.02.004 · Cited by 546
Koltovskaia, S. (2020) · Assessing Writing · doi:10.1016/j.asw.2020.100450 · Cited by 447
Zhang, Z. (. (2020) · Assessing Writing · doi:10.1016/j.asw.2019.100439 · Cited by 256
Exploring student engagement with peer feedback on L2 writing
Fan, Y., & Xu, J. (2020) · Journal of Second Language Writing · doi:10.1016/j.jslw.2020.100775 · Cited by 222
L2 student engagement with automated feedback on writing: Potential for learning and issues of trust
Ranalli, J. (2021) · Journal of Second Language Writing · doi:10.1016/j.jslw.2021.100816 · Cited by 184
Zhan, Y., & Yan, Z. (2026) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2025.2471821 · Cited by 162
Cheng, X., & Liu, Y. (2022) · System · doi:10.1016/j.system.2022.102880 · Cited by 99
Generative artificial intelligence as an enabler of student feedback engagement: a framework
Zhan, Y., Boud, D., Dawson, P., & Yan, Z. (2025) · Higher Education Research & Development · doi:10.1080/07294360.2025.2476513 · Cited by 94
Yan, D., & Zhang, S. (2024) · Humanities and Social Sciences Communications · doi:10.1057/s41599-024-03543-y · Cited by 90
Teachers' accounts of learners' engagement and disaffection in the language classroom
Mystkowska-Wiertelak, A. (2022) · The Language Learning Journal · doi:10.1080/09571736.2020.1800067 · Cited by 83
Zou, S., Guo, K., Wang, J., & Liu, Y. (2026) · Computer Assisted Language Learning · doi:10.1080/09588221.2024.2447279 · Cited by 79
Student Engagement with Written Feedback: Critical Issues and Way Forward
Mao, Z., & Lee, I. (2024) · RELC Journal · doi:10.1177/00336882221150811 · Cited by 69
Yeung, S. (2025) · Journal of Second Language Writing · doi:10.1016/j.jslw.2025.101203 · Cited by 70
Cheng, X., & Zhang, L. J. (2024) · Studies in Educational Evaluation · doi:10.1016/j.stueduc.2024.101337 · Cited by 62
EFL student engagement with giving peer feedback in academic writing: A longitudinal study
Zhang, F., Schunn, C., Chen, S., Li, W., & Li, R. (2023) · Journal of English for Academic Purposes · doi:10.1016/j.jeap.2023.101255 · Cited by 63
Zhang, T., Chen, X., Hu, J., & Ketwan, P. (2021) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.660564 · Cited by 51
“This also applies to the instruction of WCF. Learner affective engagement with teacher WCF can affect how learners perceive and respond to the WCF they receive (Ellis, 2010).”
Ramadan Elbaioumi Shaddad, A., & Jember, B. (2024) · Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education · doi:10.1186/s40862-024-00261-5 · Cited by 28
How Does that Make You Feel: Students’ Affective Engagement with Feedback
Ene, E., & Yao, J. (. (2021) · Language Teaching Research Quarterly · doi:10.32038/ltrq.2021.25.04 · Cited by 19
Department of Foreign Languages, I. U. O. S. A. T., Farsani, M. A., & Aghamohammadi, N. (2021) · Mextesol Journal · doi:10.61871/mj.v45n4-1 · Cited by 9
M Albelihi, H. H. (2022) · F1000Research · doi:10.12688/f1000research.108680.1 · Cited by 6
LLM feedback for academic writing: Effects on students’ performance and engagement
Glüsing, R., Fleckenstein, J., Schmidt, F. T. C., & Möller, J. (2026) · Contemporary Educational Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2026.102463 · Cited by 2
Metadata
- Authors
- Ellis, R.
- Venue
- Studies in Second Language Acquisition
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2010-04-23
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 335-349
- ISSN
- 0272-2631 (ISSN-L)
- 1470-1545
- OpenAlex
- W2241154442
- Cited by
- 418
- References
- 15
- FWCI
- 42.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
