Cited by 134Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual OffendingCrime Patterns and InterventionsChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development

Sex differences in the genetic and environmental influences on the development of antisocial behavior

JACOBSON, KRISTEN C., PRESCOTT, CAROL A., KENDLER, KENNETH S.·2002·Development and Psychopathology

Abstract

The present study uses a population-based sample of 6.806 adult twins from same-sex and opposite-sex twin pairs to examine sex differences in the underlying genetic and environmental architecture of the development of antisocial behavior (AB). Retrospective reports of AB during three different developmental periods were obtained: prior to age 15 years (childhood), age 15-17 years (adolescent), and age 18 years and older (adult). Structural equation modeling analyses revealed that there was no evidence for sex-specific genetic or sex-specific shared family environmental influences on the development of AB; that is, the types of genetic and environmental influence were similar for males and females. For both sexes, a model that allowed for genetic influences on adolescent and adult AB that were not shared with childhood AB fit better than a model with a single genetic factor. In contrast, shared environmental influences on adolescent and adult AB overlapped entirely with shared environmental influences on childhood AB. Genetic factors played a larger role in variation in childhood AB among females, whereas shared environmental factors played a larger role among males. However, heritability of AB increased from childhood to adolescence and adulthood for both sexes, and the magnitude of genetic and environmental influences on adolescent and adult AB was approximately equal across sex. We speculate that sex differences in timing of puberty may account for the earlier presence of genetic effects among females.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0954579402002110

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
JACOBSON, K. C., PRESCOTT, C. A., & KENDLER, K. S.
Affiliations
Virginia Commonwealth University (US)
Venue
Development and Psychopathology
Published
2002-05-15
Volume
14
Issue
2
Pages
395-416
ISSN
  • 0954-5794 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-2198
OpenAlex
W2118324733
Cited by
134
References
13
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 8
FWCI
6.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Development and Psychopathology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5k05mh001277-05)
  • National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (R01AA009095, AA-09095)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (MH/AA 49492, MH-01277, R01MH040828, MH 40828)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Crime Patterns and Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
Keywords
antisocial behavior, sex differences, heritability, genetic factors, shared environmental factors, family environment, childhood antisocial behavior, adolescent antisocial behavior, puberty timing, twin studies
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Antisocial Personality Disorder, Child, Diseases in Twins, Female, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Personality Development, Risk Factors, Sex Factors, Social Environment, Twins, Dizygotic, Twins, Monozygotic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review