Cited by 56Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchNursing care and researchGrief, Bereavement, and Mental Health

Do Changes in Coping Style Explain the Effectiveness of Interventions for Psychological Morbidity in Family Carers of People with Dementia? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Open access
Li, Ryan, Cooper, Claudia, Austin, Allana, Livingston, Gill·2013·International Psychogeriatrics

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Observational studies find that family carers of people with dementia who use more emotional support and acceptance-based coping, and less dysfunctional coping, are less depressed and anxious. We hypothesized that interventions effective in reducing psychological symptoms would increase emotional support and acceptance-based coping, or decrease dysfunctional coping. METHODS: We systematically reviewed randomized controlled trials published up to July 2011, of interventions for carers of people with dementia measuring coping and psychological morbidity. We rated study validity and reported findings. We conducted fixed-effect meta-analyses for interventions where possible. RESULTS: Eight of 433 papers identified by the search met inclusion criteria. All measured coping immediately after intervention. Two interventions significantly decreased depressive or anxiety symptoms: the smaller study found no change in dysfunctional coping. Neither measured emotional support and acceptance-based coping. Meta-analysis found that both group coping skills interventions alone (SMD = -0.39, 95% CI = -0.75 to -0.03, p = 0.04) and with behavioral activation (SMD = -0.26, 95% CI = -0.48 to -0.04, p = 0.02) significantly increased dysfunctional coping, while significantly reducing depressive symptoms. Positive coping (a mix of emotional and solution-focused strategies) increased (SMD = 0.28, 95% CI = 0.05-0.51, p = 0.02) with group coping skills interventions and behavioral activation. CONCLUSIONS: Contrary to our hypothesis, dysfunctional coping increased when carer depressive symptoms improved. There was preliminary evidence that emotional support and acceptance-based coping increased, as positive coping increased although solution-focused coping alone did not. More research is needed to elucidate whether successful interventions work through changing coping strategies immediately and in the longer term.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s1041610212001755

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Li, R., Cooper, C., Austin, A., & Livingston, G.
Affiliations
University College London (GB)
Corresponding author
Li, Ryan
Venue
International Psychogeriatrics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-02
Volume
25
Issue
2
Pages
204-214
ISSN
1041-6102 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1980378812
Cited by
56
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 2
FWCI
0.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Psychogeriatrics (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Institute for Health and Care Research (08/14/06)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Nursing care and research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health
Keywords
family caregivers, dementia, coping styles, dysfunctional coping, emotional support, positive coping, depressive symptoms, anxiety symptoms, behavioral activation, psychological morbidity, intervention effectiveness
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Aged, Anxiety, Behavior Therapy, Dementia, Depression, Family Health, Humans, Problem Solving, Psychological Techniques, Social Support, Stress, Psychological, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Caregivers, Outcome Assessment, Health Care, Cost of Illness, Emotional Intelligence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review