Cited by 31Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchNursing care and researchHealth and Well-being Studies

The effect of psychosocial support intervention on depression in patients with dementia and their family caregivers: an assessor-blinded randomized controlled trial

Open access
Bruvik, Froydis Kristine, Allore, Heather G., Ranhoff, Anette Hylen, Engedal, Knut·2013·Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders Extra

Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIM: A three-component tailored psychosocial 12-month assessor-blinded randomized controlled trial to reduce depression in people with dementia (PWD) and carers was conducted. METHODS: A total of 230 home-dwelling dyads of PWD and their carers were randomized to usual care or intervention consisting of three components over 12 months. Primary outcomes were the difference between the baseline and 12-month score on the Cornell Scale of Depression in Dementia (CSDD) in the PWD and on the Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS) in the carers. RESULTS: The intent-to-treat difference between the baseline and 12-month change score was not significant between the intervention and control groups for the CSDD (p = 0.95) or GDS (p = 0.82). CONCLUSIONS: The trial did not show a significant difference between usual care and the intervention on depressive symptoms in PWD or their family caregivers. © 2013 S. Karger AG, Basel.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1159/000355912

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 38 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bruvik, F. K., Allore, H. G., Ranhoff, A. H., & Engedal, K.
Affiliations
  • Yale University (US)
  • University of Bergen (NO)
  • Oslo University Hospital (NO)
Venue
Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders Extra
Publisher
S. Karger AG
Published
2013-10-26
Volume
3
Issue
1
Pages
386-397
ISSN
1664-5464 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2076779718
Cited by
31
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2014: 7
FWCI
2.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders Extra (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • Yale University (P30AG21342)
  • Norges Forskningsråd
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute on Aging (P30 AG21342, P30AG021342)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Nursing care and research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Health and Well-being Studies
Keywords
depression, dementia, family caregivers, caregiver burden, dyadic intervention, home-dwelling patients, personalized interventions, depressive symptoms

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review