Cited by 38Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchNursing care and researchFamily Caregiving in Mental Illness

Coping Strategies as Mediators of the Effect of the START (Strategies for RelaTives) Intervention on Psychological Morbidity for Family Carers of People with Dementia in a Randomised Controlled Trial

Li, Ryan, Cooper, Claudia, Barber, Julie, Rapaport, Penny, Griffin, Mark, Livingston, Gill·2014·Journal of Affective Disorders

Abstract

Background Family carers of people with dementia frequently become depressed or anxious. In observational studies, more emotion-focused and less dysfunctional coping predict fewer psychological symptoms, but no randomised controlled trial (RCT) has directly investigated emotion-focused coping as mediator of effectiveness of a successful psychological intervention. We hypothesised that emotion-focused coping would mediate the START psychological intervention׳s effects in an RCT. We tested whether mediated effects were moderated by severity of baseline symptoms.Methods 260 family carers from NHS dementia services were randomised to START (manualised coping skills intervention), or treatment-as-usual (TAU). Blinded raters administered the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS-T) and Brief COPE inventory at baseline, 4 and 8 months. HADS-T improved in the intervention group when compared to TAU at all levels of psychological distress. We tested whether coping was a mediator and for moderated mediation, and (post-hoc) subgroup treatment effects on coping.Results Data were available for 187 carers (71.9%) for the mediation analysis. The reduced HADS-T score in the intervention group was mediated by increased emotion-focused coping only among carers with higher (16+) baseline HADS-T scores (mediated effect=-0.63 [-1.11, -0.15]; proportion of overall effect=33% [3%, 64%]).Limitations We did not measure plausible psychosocial treatment mechanisms other than coping.Conclusions START benefited family carers both in preventing and treating psychological morbidity, through different mechanisms of action. The most psychologically distressed carers increased their emotion-focused coping and did not decrease their dysfunctional coping, while others benefited but not through this mechanism.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jad.2014.07.008

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Li, R., Cooper, C., Barber, J., Rapaport, P., Griffin, M., & Livingston, G.
Affiliations
University College London (GB)
Corresponding author
Li, Ryan
Venue
Journal of Affective Disorders
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-10
Volume
168
Pages
298-305
ISSN
0165-0327 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2032944554
Cited by
38
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1
FWCI
1.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Affective Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Institute for Health and Care Research (08/14/99)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Nursing care and research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Family Caregiving in Mental Illness
Keywords
family caregivers, dementia, coping strategies, emotion-focused coping, dysfunctional coping, anxiety, depression, psychological morbidity, mediation analysis, moderated mediation, baseline symptom severity
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Alzheimer Disease, Anxiety, Dementia, Depression, Emotions, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Morbidity, Severity of Illness Index, Stress, Psychological, Caregivers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review