Cited by 35Psychotherapy Techniques and ApplicationsAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPsychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research

The Course of the Working Alliance during Virtual Reality and Exposure Group Therapy for Social Anxiety Disorder

Ngai, Irene, Tully, Erin C., Anderson, Page L.·2015·Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy

Abstract

Background: Psychoanalytic theory and some empirical research suggest the working alliance follows a “rupture and repair” pattern over the course of therapy, but given its emphasis on collaboration, cognitive behavioral therapy may yield a different trajectory. Aims: The current study compares the trajectory of the working alliance during two types of cognitive behavioral therapy for social anxiety disorder – virtual reality exposure therapy (VRE) and exposure group therapy (EGT), one of which (VRE) has been proposed to show lower levels of working alliance due to the physical barriers posed by the technology (e.g. no eye contact with therapist during exposure). Method: Following randomization, participants (N = 63) diagnosed with social anxiety disorder received eight sessions of manualized EGT or individual VRE and completed a standardized self-report measure of working alliance after each session. Results: Hierarchical linear modeling showed overall high levels of working alliance that changed in rates of growth over time; that is, increases in working alliance scores were steeper at the beginning of therapy and slowed towards the end of therapy. There were no differences in working alliance between the two treatment groups. Conclusion: Results neither support a rupture/repair pattern nor the idea that the working alliance is lower for VRE participants. Findings are consistent with the idea that different therapeutic approaches may yield different working alliance trajectories.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s135246581300088x

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ngai, I., Tully, E. C., & Anderson, P. L.
Affiliations
Georgia State University (US)
Corresponding author
Anderson, Page L.
Venue
Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy
Published
2013-10-17
Volume
43
Issue
2
Pages
167-181
ISSN
  • 1352-4658 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-1833
OpenAlex
W2139233881
Cited by
35
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1
FWCI
1.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R42MH060506, R42 MH60506-02)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research
Keywords
therapeutic relationship, social anxiety disorder, virtual reality exposure therapy, rupture and repair, cognitive behavioral therapy, psychoanalytic theory, client-therapist collaboration
MeSH terms
Adult, Female, Humans, Implosive Therapy, Male, Middle Aged, Phobic Disorders, Professional-Patient Relations, Psychotherapy, Group, Social Behavior, Virtual Reality Exposure Therapy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review