Cited by 77Psychotherapy Techniques and ApplicationsAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPsychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research

The therapeutic alliance in exposure therapy for anxiety-related disorders: A critical review

Buchholz, Jennifer L., Abramowitz, Jonathan S.·2020·Journal of Anxiety Disorders

Abstract

The therapeutic alliance has been the subject of a great deal of psychotherapy research, and evidence from numerous empirical studies suggests that a strong patient-therapist relationship predicts favorable treatment outcomes. Despite the consistency of the alliance outcome relationship across treatment modalities and diagnoses, little attention has been given to this potential prognostic indicator in exposure therapy for anxiety-related disorders. Given that exposure therapy requires patients to engage in challenging and distressing activities (e.g., confrontation with feared stimuli), a strong alliance between patient and therapist is conceptually relevant to treatment. Relatively few published exposure therapy trials have included the therapeutic alliance as a process variable, and no single review summarizes findings from this body of literature. Accordingly, the purpose of this review is to provide an overview and synthesis of existing research on the alliance-outcome relationship in exposure therapy. Methodological and conceptual considerations will be discussed, and future research priorities will be identified.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.janxdis.2020.102194

Cites

74 of 74 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Buchholz, J. L., & Abramowitz, J. S.
Affiliations
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
Corresponding author
Buchholz, Jennifer L.
Venue
Journal of Anxiety Disorders
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-03
Volume
70
Pages
102194
ISSN
0887-6185 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3000434067
Cited by
77
References
74
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 4
FWCI
0.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Anxiety Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research
Keywords
therapeutic relationship, exposure therapy, anxiety disorders, treatment outcomes, prognostic factors, process parameters, psychotherapy
MeSH terms
Therapeutic Alliance, Anxiety, Anxiety Disorders, Humans, Implosive Therapy, Professional-Patient Relations, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review