Cited by 41Digital Mental Health InterventionsMental Health Treatment and AccessAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

Attitudes and preferences towards self-help treatments for depression in comparison to psychotherapy and antidepressant medication

Open access
Hanson, Katie, Webb, Thomas L., Sheeran, Paschal, Turpin, Graham·2016·Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy

Abstract

Background: Self-help is an effective treatment for depression. Less is known, however, about how acceptable people find different self-help treatments for depression. Aims: To investigate preferences and attitudes toward different self-help treatments for depression in comparison to psychotherapy and antidepressants. Method:N = 536 people who were not actively seeking treatment for depression were randomly assigned to read about one of five treatment options (bibliotherapy, Internet-based self-help, guided self-help, antidepressants, or psychotherapy) before rating how acceptable they found the treatment. Participants also ranked the treatments in order of preference. Results: Psychotherapy and guided self-help were found to be the most acceptable and preferred treatment options. Antidepressants and bibliotherapy were found to be the least acceptable treatments, with antidepressants rated as the most likely to have side effects. Preference data reflected the above findings – psychotherapy and guided self-help were the most preferred treatment options. Conclusions: The findings highlight differences in attitudes and preferences between guided and unguided self-help interventions; and between self-help interventions and psychotherapy. Future research should focus on understanding why unguided self-help interventions are deemed to be less acceptable than guided self-help interventions for treating depression.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s1352465815000041

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Stigma specific to depression seems to be lowest when a combination of life stress, chemical imbalances and genetic abnormalities is endorsed rather than a single biological cause.

    “Stigma specific to depression seems to be lowest when a combination of life stress, chemical imbalances and genetic abnormalities is endorsed rather than a single biological cause. 359”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hanson, K., Webb, T. L., Sheeran, P., & Turpin, G.
Affiliations
  • Sheffield Hallam University (GB)
  • University of Sheffield (GB)
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
Corresponding author
Hanson, Katie
Venue
Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy
Published
2015-02-20
Volume
44
Issue
2
Pages
129-139
ISSN
  • 1352-4658 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-1833
OpenAlex
W2103495254
Cited by
41
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2
FWCI
3.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York) (acceptedVersion)
  • SHURA (Sheffield Hallam University Research Archive) (Sheffield Hallam University) (acceptedVersion)
  • Carolina Digital Repository (University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill) (submittedVersion)
  • UNC Libraries
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
depression, self-help treatment, treatment preferences, treatment acceptability, psychotherapy, antidepressants, bibliotherapy, online self-help, guided self-help, adverse effects
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Antidepressive Agents, Bibliotherapy, Depression, Major Depressive Disorder, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Patient Acceptance of Health Care, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Psychotherapy, Quality of Life, Self Care, Treatment Outcome, Internet

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review