Cited by 882Neural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesMemory and Neural MechanismsPrimate Behavior and Ecology

Comparative cytoarchitectonic analysis of the human and the macaque ventrolateral prefrontal cortex and corticocortical connection patterns in the monkey

Petrides, M., Pandya, D. N.·2002·European Journal of Neuroscience

Abstract

A comparison of the cytoarchitecture of the human and the macaque monkey ventrolateral prefrontal cortex demonstrated a region in the monkey that exhibits the architectonic characteristic of area 45 in the human brain. This region occupies the dorsal part of the ventrolateral prefrontal convexity just below area 9/46v. Rostroventral to area 45 in the human brain lies a large cortical region labelled as area 47 by Brodmann. The ventrolateral component of this region extending as far as the lateral orbital sulcus has architectonic characteristics similar to those of the ventrolateral prefrontal region labelled by Walker as area 12 in the macaque monkey. We designated this region in both the human and the monkey ventrolateral prefrontal cortex as area 47/12. Thus, area 47/12 designates the specific part of the zone previously labelled as area 47 in the human brain that has the same overall architectonic pattern as that of Walker's area 12 in the macaque monkey brain. The cortical connections of these two areas were examined in the monkey by injecting fluorescent retrograde tracers. Although both area 45 and area 47/12 as defined here had complex multimodal input, they could be differentiated in terms of some of their inputs. Retrograde tracers restricted to area 47/12 resulted in heavy labelling of neurons in the rostral inferotemporal visual association cortex and in temporal limbic areas (i.e. perirhinal and parahippocampal cortex). In contrast, injections of tracers into dorsally adjacent area 45 demonstrated strong labelling in the superior temporal gyrus (i.e. the auditory association cortex) and the multimodal cortex in the upper bank of the superior temporal sulcus.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1046/j.1460-9568.2001.02090.x

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The subdivision of area 45 agrees with a recent study comparing the cytoarchitectonic organization in the human and macaque cortex, in which Petrides and Pandya divided area 45 into a more anterior part (area 45 A) and a more posterior part (area 45 B, located anterior to area 44) using the width of layer II as the distinguishing feature.

    “The subdivision of area 45 agrees with a recent study comparing the cytoarchitectonic organization in the human and macaque cortex [60]: Petrides and Pandya divided area 45 into a more anterior part (area 45 A) and a more posterior part (area 45 B, located anterior to area 44) using the width of layer II as the distinguishing feature (being narrower in area 45 A than in 45 B).”
  • The arcuate fasciculus and temporo-parietal section of the SLF connect the superior temporal gyrus with the prefrontal cortex, which modulates numerous language functions and audio-spatial information.

    “The arcuate fasciculus and temporo-parietal section of the SLF connect the superior temporal gyrus (Tables 2, 3 and 4) with the prefrontal cortex, which modulates numerous language functions and audio-spatial information [67].”
  • The SLF III has been associated with language articulation and connects the rostral part of the inferior parietal lobule with the middle frontal gyrus, the inferior frontal gyrus, and the frontal lobe.

    “The SLF III has been associated with language articulation and connects the rostral part of the inferior parietal lobule with the middle frontal gyrus, the inferior frontal gyrus (Table 2), and the frontal lobe (Table 5) [67].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Petrides, M., & Pandya, D. N.
Affiliations
Boston University (US)
Corresponding author
Petrides, M.
Venue
European Journal of Neuroscience
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2002-07
Volume
16
Issue
2
Pages
291-310
ISSN
  • 0953-816X (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-9568
OpenAlex
W2116994934
Cited by
882
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 29 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 32 · 2022: 31 · 2021: 39 · 2020: 34 · 2019: 30 · 2018: 31 · 2017: 45 · 2016: 41 · 2015: 38 · 2014: 37 · 2013: 47 · 2012: 56
FWCI
10.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • European Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Primate Behavior and Ecology
Keywords
ventrolateral prefrontal cortex, cytoarchitecture, human-macaque comparison, Brodmann area 45, corticocortical connections, retrograde tracing, perirhinal cortex, parahippocampal cortex, superior temporal gyrus, auditory association cortex, superior temporal sulcus
MeSH terms
Aged, Animals, Brain Mapping, Coloring Agents, Fluorescent Dyes, Humans, Macaca mulatta, Male, Neural Pathways, Neurons, Prefrontal Cortex

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review