Cited by 272Attention Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesDevelopmental and Educational Neuropsychology

Event-Related fMRI Evidence of Frontotemporal Involvement in Aberrant Response Inhibition and Task Switching in Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder

TAMM, LEANNE, MENON, VINOD, RINGEL, JESSICA, REISS, ALLAN L.·2004·Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry

Abstract

Objective Response inhibition deficits are characteristic of individuals with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Previous functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) studies investigating the neural correlates of this dysfunction have used block designs, making it difficult to disentangle activation differences specifically related to response inhibition from activation differences related to subprocesses involved in task performance. The current study was designed to further enhance our understanding of this critical function in individuals with ADHD using event-related fMRI.Method Ten adolescent boys diagnosed with ADHD, combined type, and 12 typically developing controls completed a Go/NoGo task modified to control for novelty processing.Results The ADHD group made significantly more errors of omission and more errors of commission than the control group. Further, compared with controls, individuals with ADHD showed marked abnormalities in brain activation during response inhibition, including hypoactivation of the anterior/mid-cingulate cortex extending to the supplementary motor area and hyperactivation of the left temporal gyrus.Conclusions The authors suggest that underactivation in frontal regions reflects core deficits in response/task-switching abilities for the ADHD group.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/01.chi.0000140452.51205.8d

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
TAMM, L., MENON, V., RINGEL, J., & REISS, A. L.
Affiliations
Stanford Medicine (US)
Corresponding author
TAMM, LEANNE
Venue
Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2004-11
Volume
43
Issue
11
Pages
1430-1440
ISSN
0890-8567 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2123934982
Cited by
272
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 19 · 2012: 18
FWCI
8.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
NIH (HD40761, HD31715, MH01142, MH50047, and MH19908)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Developmental and Educational Neuropsychology
Keywords
attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, response inhibition, task switching, event-related fMRI, anterior cingulate cortex, supplementary motor area, go/no-go task, adolescents
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Frontal Lobe, Humans, Inhibition, Psychological, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Task Performance and Analysis, Temporal Lobe, Case-Control Studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review