Cited by 201Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchPhysical Activity and HealthCognitive Functions and Memory

Long-term effects of resistance exercise training on cognition and brain volume in older women: results from a randomized controlled trial

Open access
Best, John R., Chiu, Bryan K., Liang Hsu, Chun, Nagamatsu, Lindsay S., Liu-Ambrose, Teresa·2015·Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society

Abstract

Aerobic exercise training has been shown to attenuate cognitive decline and reduce brain atrophy with advancing age. The extent to which resistance exercise training improves cognition and prevents brain atrophy is less known, and few studies include long-term follow-up cognitive and neuroimaging assessments. We report data from a randomized controlled trial of 155 older women, who engaged in 52 weeks of resistance training (either once- or twice-weekly) or balance-and-toning (twice-weekly). Executive functioning and memory were assessed at baseline, 1-year follow-up (i.e., immediately post-intervention), and 2-year follow-up. A subset underwent structural magnetic resonance imaging scans at those time points. At 2-year follow-up, both frequencies of resistance training promoted executive function compared to balance-and-toning (standardized difference [d]=.31-.48). Additionally, twice-weekly resistance training promoted memory (d=.45), reduced cortical white matter atrophy (d=.45), and increased peak muscle power (d=.27) at 2-year follow-up relative to balance-and-toning. These effects were independent of one another. These findings suggest resistance training may have a long-term impact on cognition and white matter volume in older women.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s1355617715000673

Cites

56 of 56 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Muthén, L.K., & Muthén, B.O. (2014). Mplus User's Guide (6th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.
  2. Spreen, O., & Strauss, E. (1998). A compendium of neurological tests (2nd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press, Inc.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Best, J. R., Chiu, B. K., Liang Hsu, C., Nagamatsu, L. S., & Liu-Ambrose, T.
Affiliations
  • University of British Columbia (CA)
  • University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
Corresponding author
Liu-Ambrose, Teresa
Venue
Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society
Published
2015-11
Volume
21
Issue
10
Pages
745-756
ISSN
  • 1355-6177 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-7661
OpenAlex
W2173338503
Cited by
201
References
56
Citations by year
2026: 19 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 28 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 26 · 2018: 23 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 4
FWCI
11.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Alzheimer's Society
  • Vancouver Foundation
  • Michael Smith Health Research BC
  • Canadian Institutes of Health Research
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
Keywords
resistance training, older women, cognitive aging, executive function, memory, brain atrophy, white matter atrophy, cortical volume, muscle power, balance training, long-term training effects
MeSH terms
Aged, Brain, Cognition Disorders, Female, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Memory, Neuropsychological Tests, Reaction Time, Retrospective Studies, Time Factors, Verbal Learning, Logistic Models, Muscle Strength, Resistance Training, Executive Function

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review