Cited by 86Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchAlzheimer's disease research and treatmentsPhysical Activity and Health

Effects of physical exercise on Alzheimer's disease biomarkers: a systematic review of intervention studies

Frederiksen, Kristian Steen, Gjerum, Le, Waldemar, Gunhild, Hasselbalch, Steen Gregers·2017·Journal of Alzheimer s Disease

Abstract

Physical exercise may be an important adjunct to pharmacological treatment of Alzheimer's disease (AD). Animal studies indicate that exercise may be disease modifying through several mechanisms including reduction of AD pathology. We carried out a systematic review of intervention studies of physical exercise with hippocampal volume (on MRI), amyloid-β, total tau, phosphorylated tau in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), 18F-FDG-PET or amyloid PET as outcome measures in healthy subjects, patients with subjective memory complaints, mild cognitive impairment, or AD. We identified a total of 8 studies of which 6 investigated the effects of exercise on hippocampal volume in healthy subjects and 1 on CSF biomarkers and 1 on hippocampal volume in AD, and none investigating the remaining outcome measures or patient groups. Methodological quality of identified studies was generally low. One study found a detrimental effect on hippocampal volume and one found a positive effect, whereas the remaining studies did not find an effect of exercise on outcome measures. The present systematic study identified a relatively small number of studies, which did not support an effect of exercise on hippocampal volume. Methodological issues such small to moderate sample sizes and inadequate ramdomization procedures further limits conclusions. Our findings highlight the difficulties in conducting high quality studies of exercise and further studies are needed before definite conclusions may be reached.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3233/jad-170567

Cites

65 of 65 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Frederiksen, K. S., Gjerum, L., Waldemar, G., & Hasselbalch, S. G.
Affiliations
University of Copenhagen (DK)
Corresponding author
Frederiksen, Kristian Steen
Venue
Journal of Alzheimer s Disease
Published
2017-11-28
Volume
61
Issue
1
Pages
359-372
ISSN
  • 1387-2877 (ISSN-L)
  • 1875-8908
OpenAlex
W2769822337
Cited by
86
References
65
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 2
FWCI
1.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Alzheimer s Disease (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
Keywords
physical activity, Alzheimer's disease
MeSH terms
Alzheimer Disease, Hippocampus, Humans, Biomarkers, Exercise, Outcome Assessment, Health Care, Physical Therapy Modalities

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review