Cited by 550Nutritional Studies and DietNutrition and Health StudiesNutrition, Health and Food Behavior

Validation of a self-administered food-frequency questionnaire administered in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC) Study: comparison of energy, protein, and macronutrient intakes estimated with the doubly labeled water, urinary nitrogen, and repeated 24-h dietary recall methods

Open access
Kroke, Anja, Klipstein-Grobusch, Kerstin, Voss, Susanne, Möseneder, Jutta, Thielecke, Frank, Noack, Rudolf, Boeing, Heiner·1999·The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition

Abstract

Background The validation of dietary assessment instruments is critical in the evaluation of diet as a chronic disease risk factor.Objective The objective was to assess the validity of a self-administered food-frequency questionnaire by comparison with dietary recall, urinary nitrogen excretion, and total energy expenditure data.Design Over a 1-y period, data from twelve 24-h dietary recalls, a food-frequency questionnaire, and four 24-h urine samples were obtained from 134 study participants of the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC) Study in Potsdam, Germany. In a substudy of 28 participants, total energy expenditure from doubly labeled water measurements was assessed.Results Energy-adjusted, deattenuated correlation coefficients between the questionnaire and the recalls ranged from 0.54 for dietary fiber to 0.86 for alcohol. Cross-classification of quintiles of nutrient intakes from the questionnaire and recalls indicated severe misclassification to be <4%. Reported protein intake correlated with estimated protein excretion (r = 0.46). Energy intake and total energy expenditure were also significantly correlated (r = 0.48); however, all but one subject underreported their energy intake. The magnitude of underreporting varied considerably, by 22% on average, and increased slightly with increasing energy intake. A similar pattern of underreporting was observed when energy intakes from the 24-h dietary recalls were compared with total energy expenditure.Conclusions These data indicate an acceptable relative validity of the food-frequency questionnaire in this study population. Compared with measurements of total energy expenditure and protein excretion, however, only moderate agreement with both the food-frequency questionnaire and the 24-h dietary recalls was observed.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/ajcn/70.4.439

Cites

60 of 60 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. van't Veer P, Kardinaal AFM, Bausch-Goldbohm RA, Kok FJ. Bio- markers for validation. Eur J Clin Nutr 1993;47:S58-63.
  2. Voss S, Charrondiere UR, Slimani N, et al. EPIC-SOFT-ein Europaweites Erfassungs-und Kodierungssystem fuer 24-Stunden- Erinnerungsprotokolle. (EPIC-SOFT-a European wide dietary assessment instrument for 24-hour recalls.) Z Ernahrungswiss 1998; 37:227-33 (in German).
  3. Coward WA. Measurement of energy expenditure in clinical practice. Proc Nutr Soc 1991;50:227-37.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kroke, A., Klipstein-Grobusch, K., Voss, S., Möseneder, J., Thielecke, F., Noack, R., & Boeing, H.
Affiliations
German Institute of Human Nutrition (DE)
Corresponding author
Kroke, Anja
Venue
The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1999-10
Volume
70
Issue
4
Pages
439-447
ISSN
0002-9165 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1887821331
Cited by
550
References
60
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 31 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 24 · 2016: 34 · 2015: 34 · 2014: 29 · 2013: 28 · 2012: 15
FWCI
17.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Journal of Clinical Nutrition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Nutritional Studies and Diet
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Nutrition and Health Studies
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
Keywords
food frequency questionnaire validation, dietary assessment, energy intake, protein intake, macronutrient intake, doubly labeled water, total energy expenditure, urinary nitrogen excretion, 24-hour dietary recall, dietary fiber intake, alcohol consumption, EPIC cohort
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Energy Intake, Diet Surveys, Dietary Proteins, Europe, Female, Humans, Life Style, Male, Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry, Middle Aged, Oxygen Radioisotopes, Surveys and Questionnaires, Urea, Reproducibility of Results, Cohort Studies, Biomarkers, Body Mass Index, Deuterium Oxide, Statistics, Nonparametric

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review