Cited by 126Treatment of Major DepressionElectroconvulsive Therapy StudiesTryptophan and brain disorders

Neurocognitive performance and serial intravenous subanesthetic ketamine in treatment-resistant depression

Open access
Shiroma, Paulo R., Albott, C. Sophia, Johns, Brian, Thuras, Paul, Wels, Joseph, Lim, Kelvin O.·2014·The International Journal of Neuropsychopharmacology

Abstract

The N-methyl-D-aspartate glutamate receptor antagonist ketamine has demonstrated rapid antidepressant effects in treatment-resistant depression (TRD). However, evaluation of ketamine's neurocognitive aspects in TRD has started to be explored. This study aims to (1) examine baseline neurocognitive performance and change in severity of depressive symptoms through six ketamine infusions, (2) examine the neurocognitive effects after completion of serial infusions and whether changes were associated to relapse to depression. Six IV infusions of 0.5 mg/Kg ketamine over 40 min were conducted on a Monday-Wednesday-Friday schedule during a 12-d period on 15 patients with TRD followed by a 4-wk observational period. Neurocognitive functioning was assessed using the CogState battery at baseline and at each follow-up visit. Tasks were designed to test attention, memory (working, visual, and verbal), speed of processing, and set shifting. The likelihood of response through six infusions was greater among depressed subjects with lower attention at baseline (F(1,13)=5.59, p=0.034). Significant improvement was found in scores of visual memory (F(4,33.82)=5.12, p=0.002), simple working memory (F(4, 24.85)=3.29, p=0.027) and complex working memory (F(4, 32.76)=4.18, p=0.008) after the last ketamine infusion. However, neurocognitive changes were accounted for by improvement in the severity of depressive symptom. The acute neurocognitive effect after completion of repeated infusions was not associated with the likelihood of subsequent relapse during follow-up. Our findings suggest a potential baseline neurocognitive predictor of ketamine response and the apparently lack of short-term neurocognitive impairment after completion of six ketamine infusions in TRD.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s1461145714001011

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In small, uncontrolled samples, convergent findings in depressed patients suggest cognitive flexibility on objective cognitive tests improves acutely following ketamine.

    “In small, uncontrolled samples, convergent findings in depressed patients further suggest cognitive flexibility on objective cognitive tests improves acutely following ketamine 132,133 .”

    From Neuroplasticity in cognitive and psychological mechanisms of depression: an integrative model (2020) · cites this paper as [132]

    The Results section ('Neurocognitive effects of six ketamine infusions'; page not provided) reports significant improvements in visual and working memory, but says all other cognitive tasks showed nonsignificant changes. The paper identifies set shifting as a tested domain, so it does not report an acute improvement in cognitive flexibility. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Improvement in many domains of memory in another study of repeated infusions over 12 days with a 4 week follow-up was seen, but was not significant when controlling for depressive symptom improvement.

    “Improvement in many domains of memory in another study of repeated infusions over 12 days with a 4 week follow-up period was seen, but was not significant when controlling for depressive symptom improvement.169”
  • Low attention and processing speed have been seen to be predictive of ketamine response.

    “Low attention169 and processing speed have also been seen to be predictive.171”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [11]11. First MB, Spitzer RL, Gibbon M, Williams JBW (1996) Structured clinical interview for DSM-IV axis I disorders, clinician version (SCID -CV). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Press.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Shiroma, P. R., Albott, C. S., Johns, B., Thuras, P., Wels, J., & Lim, K. O.
Affiliations
  • University of Minnesota (US)
  • Minneapolis VA Health Care System (US)
Corresponding author
Shiroma, Paulo R.
Venue
The International Journal of Neuropsychopharmacology
Published
2014-06-25
Volume
17
Issue
11
Pages
1805-1813
ISSN
  • 1461-1457 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-5111
OpenAlex
W2120784916
Cited by
126
References
47
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 2
FWCI
6.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The International Journal of Neuropsychopharmacology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Electroconvulsive Therapy Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Biological Psychiatry › Tryptophan and brain disorders
Keywords
ketamine, treatment-resistant depression, neuropsychological performance, working memory, visual memory, attention, set-shifting, processing speed, depression relapse, antidepressant response prediction, NMDA receptor antagonists
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Anesthetics, Dissociative, Attention, Cognition, Depression, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Ketamine, Male, Memory, Middle Aged, Neuropsychological Tests, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Verbal Learning, Treatment Outcome, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review