Cited by 667Substance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesForensic Toxicology and Drug AnalysisHIV, Drug Use, Sexual Risk

Ketamine use: a review

Morgan, Celia J. A., Curran, H. Valerie, the Independent Scientific Committee on Drugs (ISCD)·2012·Addiction

Abstract

Aims Ketamine remains an important medicine in both specialist anaesthesia and aspects of pain management. At the same time, its use as a recreational drug has spread in many parts of the world during the past few years. There are now increasing concerns about the harmful physical and psychological consequences of repeated misuse of this drug. The aim of this review was to survey and integrate the research literature on physical, psychological and social harms of both acute and chronic ketamine use. Method The literature on ketamine was systematically searched and findings were classified into the matrix of Nutt et al.'s (2007) rational scale for assessing the harms of psychoactive substances. Results A major physical harm is ketamine induced ulcerative cystitis which, although its aetiology is unclear, seems particularly associated with chronic, frequent use of the drug. Frequent, daily use is also associated with neurocognitive impairment and, most robustly, deficits in working and episodic memory. Recent studies suggest certain neurological abnormalities which may underpin these cognitive effects. Many frequent users are concerned about addiction and report trying but failing to stop using ketamine. Conclusions The implications of these findings are drawn out for treatment of ketamine‐induced ulcerative cystitis in which interventions from urologists and from addiction specialists should be coordinated. Neurocognitive impairment in frequent users can impact negatively upon achievement in education and at work, and also compound addiction problems. Prevention and harm minimization campaigns are needed to alert young people to these harmful and potentially chronic effects of ketamine.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2011.03576.x

Cites

105 of 105 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Morgan, C. J. A., Curran, H. V., & the Independent Scientific Committee on Drugs (ISCD)
Affiliations
University College London (GB)
Corresponding author
Curran, H. Valerie
Venue
Addiction
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2011-07-22
Volume
107
Issue
1
Pages
27-38
ISSN
  • 0965-2140 (ISSN-L)
  • 1360-0443
OpenAlex
W1961364466
Cited by
667
References
105
Citations by year
2026: 41 · 2025: 48 · 2024: 40 · 2023: 43 · 2022: 62 · 2021: 53 · 2020: 70 · 2019: 41 · 2018: 50 · 2017: 37 · 2016: 43 · 2015: 48 · 2014: 38 · 2013: 34 · 2012: 17
FWCI
3.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Addiction (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Bank (Australian Catholic University) (submittedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Economic and Social Research Council (RES-000-23-0945)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Toxicology › Forensic Toxicology and Drug Analysis
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › HIV, Drug Use, Sexual Risk
Keywords
ketamine, recreational drug use, neurocognitive impairment, memory impairment, harm reduction, pain management, anesthesia, harm prevention
MeSH terms
Acute Disease, Anesthetics, Dissociative, Animals, Child, Chronic Disease, Cystitis, Educational Status, Humans, Ketamine, Male, Memory Disorders, Risk-Taking, Abdominal Pain, Behavior, Addictive, Substance-Related Disorders, Rats, Young Adult, Cognitive Dysfunction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review