Cited by 55Treatment of Major DepressionMental Health Treatment and AccessAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

Heterogeneity in the prognosis of major depression: From the common cold to a highly debilitating and recurrent illness

Open access
Lorenzo-Luaces, L.·2015·Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences

Abstract

Two different and seemingly competing views on the diagnosis of major depressive disorder (MDD) exist. The first is that the diagnosis conflates adaptive sadness reactions with pathological states of depressed mood and that MDD is overdiagnosed and overtreated. The second is that MDD is an underdiagnosed and undertreated disorder, and one that is best characterised by a severe, chronic, recurrent or treatment-resistant course. Existing research suggests that both views are valid and merit being integrated. Anywhere from 30 to 50% of individuals will meet criteria for MDD at some point in their life. About half of these episodes are of brief duration and unlikely to recur. However, a remaining half is either chronic or recurrent. Data on the outpatient diagnosis of depression support the view that depression is simultaneously underdiagnosed and undertreated as well as overdiagnosed and overtreated. About one-third of the patients who meet criteria for MDD and receive placebos experience clinically significant and long-lasting improvement. Many other patients, however, are unresponsive to one or multiple active treatments. Thus, the diagnosis of MDD likely applies to individuals who are experiencing either normal periods of sadness or single-episode afflictions that are mild, unlikely to recur, and are placebo responsive, as well as to individuals with more severe clinical profiles. More research is needed that can help ascertain what contextual or biopsychological variables help distinguish between individuals who may be experiencing adaptive states of negative affect and those who experience severe, chronic, recurrent or treatment-resistant depressions.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s2045796015000542

Cites

64 of 64 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The diagnosis of major depressive disorder is likely causally heterogeneous.

    “Further, the diagnosis of major depressive disorder (MDD) is likely causally heterogeneous.”

    From Risk factors for relapse and recurrence of depression in adults and how they operate: A four-phase systematic review and meta-synthesis (2018) · cites this paper as Lorenzo-Luaces, 2015

    The Abstract says the MDD diagnosis encompasses both potentially adaptive sadness and severe, recurrent depression. Future recommendations call for research into contextual and biopsychological differences between these presentations. That is consistent with possible causal heterogeneity, but the paper does not establish that the diagnosed conditions have different causes. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [13]13. Fournier JC, DeRubeis RJ, Hollon SD, Dimidjian S, Amsterdam JD, Shelton RC, Fawcett J (2010). Antidepressant drug effects and depression severity. The Journal of the American Medical Association 303, 47-53.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lorenzo-Luaces, L.
Venue
Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences
Published
2015-06-17
Volume
24
Issue
6
Pages
466-472
ISSN
  • 2045-7960 (ISSN-L)
  • 2045-7979
OpenAlex
W1701884225
Cited by
55
References
64
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 2
FWCI
4.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
major depressive disorder, depression heterogeneity, prognosis, overdiagnosis, underdiagnosis, placebo response, treatment-resistant depression, chronic depression, recurrent depression, epidemiology of depression, diagnostic validity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review