Cited by 1,123Machine Learning in Materials ScienceTopic ModelingComputational and Text Analysis Methods

Unsupervised word embeddings capture latent knowledge from materials science literature

Open access
Tshitoyan, Vahe, Dagdelen, John, Weston, Leigh, Dunn, Alexander, Rong, Ziqin, Kononova, Olga, Persson, Kristin A., Ceder, Gerbrand +1 more·2019·Nature

Abstract

The overwhelming majority of scientific knowledge is published as text, which is difficult to analyse by either traditional statistical analysis or modern machine learning methods. By contrast, the main source of machine-interpretable data for the materials research community has come from structured property databases 1,2, which encompass only a small fraction of the knowledge present in the research literature. Beyond property values, publications contain valuable knowledge regarding the connections and relationships between data items as interpreted by the authors. To improve the identification and use of this knowledge, several studies have focused on the retrieval of information from scientific literature using supervised natural language processing 3-10, which requires large hand-labelled datasets for training. Here we show that materials science knowledge present in the published literature can be efficiently encoded as information-dense word embeddings 11-13 (vector representations of words) without human labelling or supervision. Without any explicit insertion of chemical knowledge, these embeddings capture complex materials science concepts such as the underlying structure of the periodic table and structure-property relationships in materials. Furthermore, we demonstrate that an unsupervised method can recommend materials for functional applications several years before their discovery. This suggests that latent knowledge regarding future discoveries is to a large extent embedded in past publications. Our findings highlight the possibility of extracting knowledge and relationships from the massive body of scientific literature in a collective manner, and point towards a generalized approach to the mining of scientific literature.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41586-019-1335-8

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • NLP extraction of process-structure-property-performance relationships by mining text corpora has enabled discovery of new materials and identification of materials synthesis procedures.

    “Another exciting outcome from NLP is to extract the process-structure-property-performance relationships by mining text corpora, which has enabled one to discover new materials 145 and identify materials synthesis procedures 146 , although there have been limited applications of this approach in concrete science.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tshitoyan, V., Dagdelen, J., Weston, L., Dunn, A., Rong, Z., Kononova, O., Persson, K. A., Ceder, G., & Jain, A.
Affiliations
  • Google (United States) (US)
  • Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (US)
  • University of California, Berkeley (US)
Corresponding author
  • Tshitoyan, Vahe
  • Ceder, Gerbrand
  • Jain, Anubhav
Venue
Nature
Published
2019-07-03
Volume
571
Issue
7763
Pages
95-98
ISSN
  • 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4687
OpenAlex
W2953641512
Cited by
1,123
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 157 · 2025: 159 · 2024: 165 · 2023: 146 · 2022: 162 · 2021: 148 · 2020: 148 · 2019: 38
FWCI
44.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
  • OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) (submittedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
Toyota Research Institute
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Machine Learning in Materials Science
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
  • Social Sciences › General Social Sciences › Computational and Text Analysis Methods
Keywords
word embeddings, materials science literature, scientific literature mining, structure-property relationships, periodic table structure, materials database
MeSH terms
Unsupervised Machine Learning, Materials Science, Electric Conductivity, Electrodes, Iron, Lithium, Magnetics, Natural Language Processing, Terminology as Topic, Research, Semantics, Temperature, Reproducibility of Results, Knowledge, Data Mining, Research Report

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review