Cited by 125

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 15 of the 15 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Nonideal Transport and Extended Elution Tailing of PFOS in Soil

Brusseau, Mark L., Khan, Naima, Wang, Yake, Yan, Ni, Van Glubt, Sarah, Carroll, Kenneth C.·2019·Environmental Science & Technology

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acs.est.9b02343

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 47

  1. NGWA (National Ground Water Association), 2017, Groundwater and PFAS: State of Knowledge and Practice
  2. 10.1002/rem.21552 · DOI
  3. 10.1016/j.watres.2018.05.020 · DOI
  4. 10.1016/j.watres.2018.10.035 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.1029/2002wr001435 · DOI
  6. 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2008.12.004 · DOI
  7. 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2008.01.001 · DOI
  8. 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2009.07.059 · DOI
  9. 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2010.07.018 · DOI
  10. 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2010.11.029 · DOI
  11. 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2012.04.038 · DOI
  12. 10.1007/s11270-014-2136-1 · DOI
  13. 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2014.08.068 · DOI
  14. 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.06.096 · DOI · Paper page
  15. 10.1080/00032718908051383 · DOI
  16. 10.1016/0169-7722(94)00041-f · DOI
  17. 10.1002/etc.5620170905 · DOI
  18. 10.1021/es00011a005 · DOI
  19. 10.2136/sssaj1997.03615995006100020003x · DOI
  20. 10.1021/es9600946 · DOI
  21. 10.1021/es971104l · DOI
  22. 10.1029/2000wr900089 · DOI
  23. 10.1029/2000wr900050 · DOI
  24. 10.1016/j.jconhyd.2009.07.002 · DOI
  25. 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2017.03.040 · DOI
  26. 10.1021/es00013a015 · DOI
  27. 10.1021/es00065a009 · DOI
  28. 10.1021/es00017a011 · DOI
  29. 10.1080/10643388909388358 · DOI
  30. 10.1016/s0309-1708(99)00047-0 · DOI
  31. 10.1080/10934529.2013.727733 · DOI
  32. 10.2136/sssaj2001.651102x · DOI
  33. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.12.017 · DOI · Paper page
  34. 10.1016/j.watres.2010.01.038 · DOI · Paper page
  35. 10.1016/j.jes.2014.11.001 · DOI
  36. 10.1071/en11119 · DOI
  37. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.08.209 · DOI
  38. Fink D. H., 1970, J.—Water Pollut. Control Fed., 42, 265
  39. 10.1021/es9804316 · DOI
  40. 10.1021/es9909982 · DOI
  41. 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2006.07.068 · DOI
  42. 10.1016/s0169-7722(97)00036-3 · DOI
  43. 10.1029/1998wr900019 · DOI
  44. 10.1029/1999wr900162 · DOI
  45. 10.1021/es5006187 · DOI · Paper page
  46. 10.1016/j.watres.2016.01.025 · DOI · Paper page
  47. 10.2134/jeq2011.0414 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Brusseau, M. L., Khan, N., Wang, Y., Yan, N., Van Glubt, S., & Carroll, K. C.
Venue
Environmental Science & Technology
Published
2019-08-29
Volume
53
Issue
18
Pages
10654-10664
ISSN
  • 0013-936X
  • 1520-5851
Cited by
125
References
15
Language
en
Funders
National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (P42 ES 4940)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review