Cited by 373Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances researchEnvironmental Chemistry and AnalysisToxic Organic Pollutants Impact

Quantitative determination of fluorotelomer sulfonates in groundwater by LC MS/MS

Schultz, Melissa M., Barofsky, Douglas F., Field, Jennifer A.·2004·Environmental Science & Technology

Abstract

Aqueous film-forming foams (AFFF) are complex mixtures containing fluorocarbon- and hydrocarbon-based surfactants that are used to fight hydrocarbon-fueled fires. The military is the largest consumer of AFFF in the United States, and fire-training activities conducted at military bases have led to groundwater contamination by unspent fuels and AFFF chemicals. A direct-injection, liquid-chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (LC MS/MS) method was developed to quantify a suite of fluorotelomer sulfonate surfactants in groundwater collected from military bases where fire-training activities were conducted. The 4:2, 6:2, and 8:2 fluorotelomer sulfonates were detected and quantified in groundwater from two of the three military bases. The total fluorotelomer sulfonate concentrations observed at Wurtsmith AFB, MI, and Tyndall AFB, FL, ranged respectively from below quantitation (< or = 0.60) to 182 microg/L and from 1100 to 14,600 microg/L. Analyses of a fluorotelomer-based AFFF concentrate by negative ion fast atom bombardment/mass spectrometry and LC MS/MS analyses indicate that the AFFF concentrate contains only a small amount of fluorotelomer sulfonates and that fluoroalkylthioamido sulfonates are the main anionic fluorosurfactant in the mixtures. More research is needed to determine the fate of fluoroalkylthioamido sulfonates in the environment.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/es035031j

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Initial concentrations of 0.01, 0.1, 1, and 10 mg/L were chosen to represent elevated levels typical at PFAS source sites such as fire-training areas and manufacturing facilities.

    “These concentrations were selected to be representative of the elevated levels typically observed for soils and groundwater at PFAS sources sites such as fire-training areas and manufacturing facilities (Schultz et al., 2004; Brusseau et al. 2020).”

    From Column versus batch methods for measuring PFOS and PFOA sorption to geomedia (2021) · cites this paper as Schultz et al., 2004

  • 6:2 FTS has been employed in aqueous film-forming firefighting foam (AFFF) in mixtures with fluoroalkylthioamido sulfonates.

    “6:2 FTS has been employed in aqueous film-forming firefighting foam (AFFF) in mixtures with fluoroalkylthioamido sulfonates [56], used as a PFOS replacement in metal plating applications [57] and is a transformation intermediate in the degradation of more complex fluorotelomer-based compounds [4].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 16

  1. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 1999, Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxic Substances. Perfluorooctane sulfonate:  current summary of human sera, health and toxicology data
  2. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 2000, Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxic Substances. Sulfonated perfluorochemicals in the environment:  sources, dispersion, fate and effects
  3. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 2000, Fed. Regist., 65, 62333
  4. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 2002, Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxic Substances. Draft of hazard assessment of perfluorooctanoic acid and its salts
  5. Kissa E., 2001, Fluorinated surfactants and repellants
  6. Hansen K. J., 2001, Environ. Sci. Technol., 35, 770
  7. Kannan K., 2001, Environ. Sci. Technol., 35, 1598
  8. Kannan K., 2001, Environ. Sci. Technol., 35, 3070
  9. Kannan K., 2002, Environ. Sci. Technol., 36, 2571
  10. Schultz M. M., 2003, Proceedings of the 51st ASMS Conference on Mass Spectrometry and Allied Topics, Montreal, PQ
  11. DuPont Company, 2002, http://www.dupont.com/zonyl/pdf/genbrochure.pdf (accessed
  12. Grant C. L., 1991, Am. Lab., 15, 33
  13. Barcelona, 1996, M. J. Symposium on Natural Attenuation of Chlorinated Organics in Ground Water
  14. Bermejo J. L., 1997, Ground Water Monit. Rem., 131, 137
  15. Field J. A., 2003, Chimia, 57, 560, 10.2533/000942903777679028 · DOI
  16. Key B. D., 1998, Environ. Sci. Technol., 32, 2287

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Schultz, M. M., Barofsky, D. F., & Field, J. A.
Affiliations
Oregon State University (US)
Corresponding author
Field, Jennifer A.
Venue
Environmental Science & Technology
Published
2004-02-04
Volume
38
Issue
6
Pages
1828-1835
ISSN
  • 0013-936X (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5851
OpenAlex
W2067287961
Cited by
373
References
13
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 30 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 22 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 21 · 2012: 7
FWCI
6.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Environmental Science & Technology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Oregon State University
  • National Institutes of Health (5p30es000210-46)
  • National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (#P30-ES00210)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances research
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Environmental Chemistry and Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Toxic Organic Pollutants Impact
Keywords
fluorotelomer sulfonates, aqueous film-forming foam, groundwater contamination, military installations, fire training, fluorosurfactants, Tyndall Air Force Base
MeSH terms
Alkanesulfonates, Environmental Monitoring, Fluorocarbons, Mass Spectrometry, Surface-Active Agents

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review