Cited by 52Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances researchEnvironmental remediation with nanomaterialsFluoride Effects and Removal

In situ remediation method for enhanced sorption of perfluoro-alkyl substances onto Ottawa sand

Aly, Yousof H., Liu, Chen, McInnis, Daniel P., Lyon, Bonnie A., Hatton, James, McCarty, Michael, Arnold, William A., Pennell, Kurt D. +1 more·2018·Journal of Environmental Engineering

Abstract

Perfluoro-alkyl substances (PFAS) have drawn increased concern in recent years. Due to resistance to many remediation methods and potential for long-range transport, there is need for continued in situ remediation technique development. One such method is enhanced sorption onto aquifer material, thereby sequestering a plume and preventing long-range migration. Batch tests and column studies were carried out to evaluate the ability of polydiallyldimethylammonium chloride (PDM) and polyamine (PA) to enhance the adsorption of six PFAS onto Ottawa sand. At a dosage of 2,000 mg/L of either PDM or PA, results show increases of adsorption of the tested PFAS in all batches by factors of 3.6–45. Column studies showed retention capacity increasing up to six times for perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) and 10 times for perfluorooctane sulfonic acid (PFOS). Normalizing partitioning coefficients from batch tests to fraction of organic carbon suggest that an interaction other than PFAS associating with organic matter may be the main driving force behind sorption enhancement. These results suggest that this method shows promise for in situ remediation of PFAS-contaminated groundwater.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1061/(asce)ee.1943-7870.0001418

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Only two prior studies directly compared Kd values from both column and batch experiments.

    “Only two of these studies conducted both column and batch experiments and directly compared the measured Kd values.”

    From Column versus batch methods for measuring PFOS and PFOA sorption to geomedia (2021) · cites this paper as Aly et al. (2018)

  • Aly et al. (2018) found batch Kd values for PFOS and PFOA on quartz sand were about 10 times lower than column-derived Kd values.

    “Aly et al. (2018) quantified sorption of PFOS and PFOA for a quartz sand. The Kd values obtained from the batch experiment were approximately 10-times smaller than the values determined from the column experiments.”

    From Column versus batch methods for measuring PFOS and PFOA sorption to geomedia (2021) · cites this paper as Aly et al. (2018)

  • Prior PFAS column-batch comparison studies used only one influent concentration, limiting comparisons and leaving unclear whether results would differ with different input concentrations.

    “The column experiments in all of the prior comparison studies cited above employed only one influent concentration. Thus, the comparisons between column and batch measurements were limited, and it is not clear if the comparisons would differ for column experiments conducted with different input concentrations.”

    From Column versus batch methods for measuring PFOS and PFOA sorption to geomedia (2021) · cites this paper as Aly et al. (2018)

  • Over the past 15 years, nearly 100 studies examined PFAS sorption by geomedia and geomedia constituents; most used batch methods, while very few used column methods.

    “Over the past 15 years, close to 100 studies have investigated the sorption of PFAS by geomedia and specific constituents of geomedia. Of these, the vast majority have used batch methods to quantify sorption, with only a very few employing column methods”

    From Column versus batch methods for measuring PFOS and PFOA sorption to geomedia (2021) · cites this paper as Aly et al., 2018

  • The equivalent-Kd values calculated for PFOS and PFOA using the isotherm regression reported herein for 0.1 mg/L are 0.23 L/kg and 0.13 L/kg, respectively, which are larger than the values reported by Aly et al. (2018).

    “These values are smaller than the equivalent-Kd values of 0.23 L/kg and 0.13 L/kg calculated for PFOS and PFOA, respectively, using the isotherm regression reported herein for 0.1 mg/L (the concentration employed in the Aly study).”

    From Column versus batch methods for measuring PFOS and PFOA sorption to geomedia (2021) · cites this paper as Aly et al. (2018)

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 43 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Aly, Y. H., Liu, C., McInnis, D. P., Lyon, B. A., Hatton, J., McCarty, M., Arnold, W. A., Pennell, K. D., & Simcik, M. F.
Affiliations
  • University of Minnesota (US)
  • Tufts University (US)
  • CH2M (United States) (US)
Corresponding author
Simcik, Matt F.
Venue
Journal of Environmental Engineering
Published
2018-09
Volume
144
Issue
9
ISSN
  • 0733-9372 (ISSN-L)
  • 1943-7870
OpenAlex
W2826231799
Cited by
52
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 4
FWCI
1.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Environmental Engineering (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances research
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Environmental remediation with nanomaterials
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Fluoride Effects and Removal
Keywords
perfluorinated compounds, PFAS, in situ remediation, Ottawa sand, poly(diallyldimethylammonium chloride), polyamines, adsorption enhancement, perfluorooctanoic acid, PFOS, groundwater contamination, partition coefficient, organic carbon, column studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review