Cited by 52Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances researchSoil Geostatistics and MappingFluoride Effects and Removal

Spatial Prediction of Concentrations of Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS) in European Soils

Open access
Moghadasi, Ramin, Mumberg, Tabea, Wanner, Philipp·2023·Environmental Science & Technology Letters

Abstract

High Resolution Image Download MS PowerPoint Slide Currently, little is known about the spatial distribution of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) in soils. In this study, machine learning was applied to a data set from the Map of Forever Pollution in Europe (MFPE) containing 6697 scattered PFAS soil concentration measurements to comprehensively predict PFAS concentrations in European soils. The model is based on a regression analysis between the PFAS soil concentrations and the distance to presumptive point sources indicated by the MFPE. Generally, decreasing PFAS concentrations were observed with increasing distances to the nearest point sources. Subsequently, on the basis of the regression analysis, a map was generated showing the PFAS concentrations in European soils by interpolating the model predictions at 10 000 random spots where no measurements were available. The map revealed that a significant portion of European soils is potentially contaminated with PFAS at concentrations of >5000 ng/kg. At this concentration, the mobilization of PFAS can lead to seepage water concentrations of 2–5 ng/L surpassing current and proposed drinking water guidelines in Europe. This illustrates the need for lower PFAS soil threshold values. Overall, the produced map provides, for the first time, comprehensive information about European PFAS soil contamination and serves as a basis for assessing its environmental risks.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acs.estlett.3c00633

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Recent mapping efforts have revealed over 17,000 PFAS contaminated sites across Europe, with high-density clusters in industrial regions of Belgium, Germany, the Netherlands, and Italy.

    “Recent mapping efforts have revealed over 17,000 PFASs contaminated sites across Europe, with high-density clusters in industrial regions of Belgium, Germany, the Netherlands, and Italy.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Authors
Moghadasi, R., Mumberg, T., & Wanner, P.
Affiliations
University of Gothenburg (SE)
Corresponding author
Wanner, Philipp
Venue
Environmental Science & Technology Letters
Published
2023-10-31
Volume
10
Issue
11
Pages
1125-1129
ISSN
2328-8930 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4388048694
Cited by
52
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 26 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 8
FWCI
4.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Environmental Science & Technology Letters (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances research
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Soil Geostatistics and Mapping
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Fluoride Effects and Removal
Keywords
per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances, spatial prediction, soil contamination mapping, drinking water guidelines, environmental risk assessment, European soils

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review