Cited by 61

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Minimizing Laboratory-Induced Decay in Bone Proteomics

Procopio, Noemi, Buckley, Michael·2017·Journal of Proteome Research

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acs.jproteome.6b00564

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • While rates of deamidation vary with temperature, pH, secondary and tertiary structures, and laboratory procedures, deamidation can be a useful indicator of protein degradation, although more work is needed to untangle contributing factors to these rates.

    “While rates of deamidation vary with temperature, pH, secondary and tertiary structures, and laboratory procedures (78, 79), deamidation can be a useful indicator of protein degradation, although still more work is needed to untangle contributing factors to these rates.”

    From Ancient protein analysis in archaeology (2021) · cites this paper as [79]

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 1 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 85

  1. 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.05220.x · DOI
  2. 10.2174/138945009788488404 · DOI
  3. 10.1586/epr.09.90 · DOI
  4. 10.1016/j.palaeo.2014.06.026 · DOI
  5. 10.1021/pr200721u · DOI
  6. 10.1074/mcp.M114.047787 · DOI
  7. 10.1371/journal.pone.0059614 · DOI
  8. Buckley M., 2015, Proc. R. Soc. B, 282
  9. 10.1038/srep23559 · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.1016/j.jas.2013.08.021 · DOI
  11. 10.1016/j.jas.2009.08.020 · DOI · Paper page
  12. 10.1007/s12520-011-0066-z · DOI
  13. 10.1002/rcm.4316 · DOI · Paper page
  14. 10.1002/rcm.6821 · DOI
  15. 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2001.tb05632.x · DOI · Paper page
  16. 10.1038/35041687 · DOI · Paper page
  17. 10.1021/ac301333t · DOI · Paper page
  18. 10.1021/ac202980z · DOI
  19. 10.1002/rcm.7445 · DOI · Paper page
  20. Muhammed A., 2012, Malaysian J. Forensic Sci., 3, 41
  21. 10.1126/science.272.5263.864 · DOI
  22. 10.1002/rcm.6351 · DOI · Paper page
  23. 10.1016/S0945-053X(01)00188-3 · DOI
  24. 10.1098/rstb.1999.0359 · DOI
  25. 10.1016/j.ijms.2010.11.010 · DOI
  26. 10.1111/j.1399-3011.1974.tb02385.x · DOI
  27. 10.1073/pnas.98.3.944 · DOI
  28. 10.1073/pnas.66.3.753 · DOI
  29. 10.1016/B978-0-12-152808-9.50013-4 · DOI
  30. 10.1126/science.183.4120.85 · DOI
  31. 10.1006/exer.2001.0983 · DOI
  32. 10.1126/science.1147046 · DOI · Paper page
  33. 10.1021/pr500903b · DOI
  34. 10.1074/mcp.O111.009381 · DOI
  35. 10.1016/j.ab.2009.05.018 · DOI
  36. Turner-Walker G., 2007, Advances in Human Palaeopathology, 3, 10.1002/9780470724187.ch1 · DOI
  37. Zhu W., 2009, Fundam. osteoporosis., 153
  38. Heinegård D., 1989, FASEB J., 3, 2042, 10.1096/fasebj.3.9.2663581 · DOI
  39. 10.1016/j.forsciint.2005.01.013 · DOI
  40. 10.1016/j.ajme.2012.05.004 · DOI
  41. 10.1146/annurev.en.37.010192.001345 · DOI
  42. Villet M. H., 2009, Current concepts in forensic entomology, 109, 10.1007/978-1-4020-9684-6_7 · DOI
  43. Swift B., 2006, Essentials of Autopsy Practice, 189, 10.1007/1-84628-026-5_8 · DOI
  44. Catts E. P., 1992, J. Agric. Entomol., 9, 245
  45. 10.1007/s12024-010-9209-2 · DOI
  46. 10.1097/00000433-199803000-00008 · DOI
  47. 10.1016/S0379-0738(02)00027-0 · DOI
  48. 10.1016/j.legalmed.2003.08.001 · DOI
  49. 10.1016/S0379-0738(02)00426-7 · DOI
  50. 10.1016/S0379-0738(03)00080-X · DOI
  51. 10.1016/S0379-0738(00)00177-8 · DOI
  52. Saukko P., 2015, Knight’s Forensic Pathology, 95, 10.1201/b13266 · DOI
  53. 10.1520/JFS12753J · DOI
  54. 10.1111/j.1556-4029.2010.01511.x · DOI
  55. 10.1520/JFS14505J · DOI
  56. Knight B., 1969, Hum. Biol., 41, 322
  57. 10.1002/mas.21375 · DOI
  58. 10.1038/sj.emboj.7600599 · DOI
  59. 10.1016/j.mad.2015.03.009 · DOI
  60. 10.1210/rp.56.1.1 · DOI
  61. 10.1111/acel.12164 · DOI
  62. 10.1006/abbi.1999.1291 · DOI
  63. 10.1016/S0047-6374(01)00363-3 · DOI
  64. 10.1016/j.exger.2007.12.001 · DOI
  65. 10.1073/pnas.221463198 · DOI
  66. 10.1021/ac9028467 · DOI
  67. 10.1167/iovs.09-4308 · DOI
  68. 10.1021/js9802493 · DOI
  69. 10.1126/science.3353715 · DOI · Paper page
  70. 10.1002/jps.1165 · DOI
  71. 10.1016/0003-2697(74)90040-2 · DOI
  72. 10.4103/0973-029X.99070 · DOI
  73. Liu L., 1998, West China J. Stomatol., 16, 103
  74. 10.1021/ac025747h · DOI
  75. 10.1021/ac0341261 · DOI
  76. 10.2174/1874210601004010223 · DOI
  77. González-Chávez S. A., 2013, Int. J. Clin. Exp. Pathol., 6, 1972
  78. 10.1016/0020-711X(83)90162-3 · DOI
  79. 10.1139/v69-668 · DOI
  80. 10.1155/2012/282574 · DOI
  81. 10.1128/JCM.03489-13 · DOI
  82. 10.1128/JCM.01512-12 · DOI
  83. 10.1113/jphysiol.1976.sp011369 · DOI
  84. 10.1111/j.1365-2141.1992.tb06444.x · DOI
  85. 10.1002/oa.858 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Procopio, N., & Buckley, M.
Affiliations
Manchester Institute of Biotechnology, The University of Manchester, 131 Princess Street, Manchester M1 7DN, U.K.
Venue
Journal of Proteome Research
Published
2016-12-07
Volume
16
Issue
2
Pages
447-458
ISSN
  • 1535-3893
  • 1535-3907
Cited by
61
References
4
Language
en
Funders
Royal Society (RG130453, UF120473)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review